Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s d pathak · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.050 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 25 1998

Pramod Kumar and Others Vs. Addl. Commissioner (Admn.), Gorkhapur and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-25-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 5 (6) and (8) and 10 (2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC875

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Pathak, Adv.

R.H. Zaidi, J.1. By means of this petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, petitioners pray for issuance of writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the orders dated 23.4.1986 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1999

Jai Kumar Singh Vs. Kallu Singh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-29-1999

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 258 to 260 and 263; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 68

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3550

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Pathak and ;P.K. Tripathi, Advs.

P.K. Jain, J. 1. This appeal Is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.2.1986 in Civil Misc. Case No. 122 of 1980 passed by the then First Additional District Judge, Moradabad, rejecting the application of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 1998

Kripa Shanker Dwivedi Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, Kanpur and An ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-21-1998

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order XLI, Rule 27; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC2091

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Dwivedi, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 12.9.1981 passed by respondent No. 1 remanding the case to the Judge Small Causes Court for deciding the suit afresh keeping in view the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 25 2012

Prakash Bang Vs. Smithkline Beecham Pharma-ceuticals (India) Ltd. and ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Apr-25-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

R.C. Jain, Presiding Member: Oral: 1. Alleging defect in goods/drugs and negligence/deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties/manufacturer of vaccine, the complainant has filed this complaint seeking a total compensation of Rs. 90,20,557...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1999

Bhola Nath (Decd) Through L.Rs. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-10-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9, 48 and 229B; Constitution of India - Article 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 167; United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 8 and 42; Agra Tenancy Act, 1926 - Sections 15(5)

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1023

Advocate for Appellant : O.P. Misra, Adv.

Shitla Prasad Srivastava, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 29th August, 1973 (incorrectly typed as 19.8.1973) 20th October. 1972 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2000

Bansal Chemical Corporation Vs. Presiding Officer, Employees' Providen ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-24-2000

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Employee's Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7(1) and 7A(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC779; [2000(84)FLR917]; (2000)ILLJ1479All; (2000)1UPLBEC712

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Pathak and ;Dinesh Pathak, Advs.

R.H. Zaidi, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satish Chaturvedi appearing for the respondents.2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for issuance of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2002

Bharat Sevak Samaj Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner (Ad ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-31-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2913

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Pathak and ;Dinesh Pathak, Advs.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of this petition, the petitioner, who had filed restoration application under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151. Code of Civil Procedure to the effect that the suit, which was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2000

Sri Ram Laxmi NaraIn Marvari Hindu Hospital and another Vs. Assistant ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-2000

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 3A, 4, 4 (1) and 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC1955; (2000)3UPLBEC2063

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Pathak, ;Dinesh Pathak and; V.B. Upadhyay, Advs.

O. P. Garg, J.1. The core question involved in the present petition for determination is whether the Assistant Registrar, Firms. Societies and Chits, exercising powers of the Registrar under the Societies Registration Act (Act No. 21...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2006

Rama Shanker Kesari Alias Patali Vs. Ist A.D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-13-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC2103

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Pathak, ;Dinesh Pathak and ;M.B. Mishra, Advs.

Shishir Kumar, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 16.8.1999 passed by 1st Additional District Judge, Sonebhadra, Annexuire-5 to the writ petition by which the amendment application filed on behalf of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2011

Shiv Dhani and Others Vs. D.D.C. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-23-2011

Subject : Property

Acts : U.P.Z.A.&L.R. Act. - Section 171;

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Pathak

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The dispute in this petition relates to the inheritance of the land holdings of late Sri Dahau. The admitted pedigree is that the petitioners Sheodhani, Murahoo and Babu...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial