Advanced Search Results

In Re: Sumani Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 294, 391, 394, 394(1), 394A, 448(2), 449 and 450; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1965

Reported in : [1979]49CompCas547(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Parekh, Adv.

Aggarwal, J.1. The petitioner herein, Sumani Private Ltd., is the transferor-company seeking amalgamation with Lalitmani Private Ltd., the transferee-company, as per scheme of amalgamation formulated by them, Ex. A to the petition. 2. When the matter...

Vasant Investment Corporation Ltd. Vs. Official Liquidator, Colaba Lan ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 80, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 256, 307, 391, 393, 466 and 643

Reported in : [1981]51CompCas20(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.B. Chinai, Adv. for the Regional Director, Company Law Board, Bombay and ;L.M. Chagla, Adv. for Ruby Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd., Bharat Estates Pvt. Ltd. and M.M. Patel, Adv. ;S.D. Parekh, Adv.

Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. The litigation pertaining to the Colaba Land and Mill Co. Ltd. has a stormy history spanning two decades. This, perhaps the last, round of litigation is in respect of a scheme propounded...

The Custodian Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections - 4(1), 9-A, 10, 11(1) and 11(2); Income Tax Act, 1961; Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 49, 68, 69, 70 and 71; Constitution of India - Article 226; Finance Act, 1975; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 77

Reported in : 2000(4)BomCR313

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Joshi, ;S.Rustomjee and ;J. Chandran, Advs. i/b; P.M. Mithi & Co.

ORDERS.H. Kapadia, J.1. This petition has been filed by the Custodian for consideration of the Scheme for Sale of shares of the notified parties under Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act,...

Jayesh Ramniklal Doshi Vs. Carbon Corporation Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 267, 283, 283(2) and 293

Reported in : 1992(2)BomCR588; (1992)94BOMLR706; [1993]76CompCas748(Bom); 1992(2)MhLj1316

Advocate for Appellant : Suresh Parekh, Adv.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. The plaintiff is a shareholder of Carbon Corporation Limited, the first defendant-company. Defendant No. 2, Shri Mukul Harkisandas Dalal, has been functioning as a managing director and as a director of the first...

Purshottam Visindas Raheja Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyContract

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 40, Rule 1; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 20

Reported in : AIR1982Bom523

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sen,;Atul Munim and;S.R. Pandit, Advs.

ORDER1. The plaintiff is the karta and manager of a joint Hindu family called Raheja sons (H.U.F.) which carries on business in the name and style of shri Tirupati Builders. The plaintiff entered into an agreement...

Ajay Cottons Limited Vs. C. Venkatraman, Chief Controller of Imports a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1990(29)LC489(Bombay)

Shah, J.1. The petitioners, Ajay Cottons Limited, a public limited company, which manufactures and exports the commodity, viz., 'absorbent cotton wool', has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, for a writ of mandamus,...

Dhanraj Mills Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Global Trust Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (2003)105BOMLR609

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Parekh

A.B. Palkar, J.1. Applicant No. 1 - Dhanraj Mills Pvt. Ltd. (D.M.L. for short) is a party notified under the provisions of Special Courts (TORTS) Act of 1992. Applicant No. 2 - Killick Financial Services Ltd....

T.A. Darbar and Company and ors. Vs. Union Bank of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 11, 17 and 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rules 329 and 986

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR702

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Nanavati and ; D.H. Nanavati, Advs.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. This notice of motion raises an interesting question of law as to whether the remedy of decree-holder Union Bank of India to execute the decree dated 17th January, 1977 passed in Suit No....

P.S. Offshore Inter Land Services Pvt. Ltd and Another Vs. Bombay Offs ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 286, 293(1), 397 and 398

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas583(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Zaiwala, Adv.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. This is a judge's summons taken out by the petitioners for an interim injunction to restrain the respondents 'from, in any manner, acting in furtherance of the agreements dated 21st May, 1990, and...

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Pure Ice Cream Company

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1946

Reported in : [1975]36STC18(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Parekh, Adv.

Madon, J.1. The respondents are manufacturers of ice-cream known as 'Kwality Ice Cream'. The respondents, inter alia, sell ice-cream at certain places which are described in the orders of the sales tax authorities and the Tribunal...