Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s c tripathi · Page 1 of about 29 results (0.080 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 22 2003

Shubhra Chaturvedi (Dr.) (Km.) Vs. Director of Education (Higher Educa ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-22-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980 - Sections 13(3)

Reported in : (2003)1UPLBEC680

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Tripathi, Adv.

M. Katju, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri S.C. Tripathi and learned Standing Counsel.2. In this case, on 23.5.2000, learned Standing Counsel was granted six weeks time to file counter-affidavit and notice was issued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1995

Jai Maakali Aluminium Metal Works Vs. Tilak and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-11-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1)

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ670All; (1996)1UPLBEC411

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Tripathi, Adv.

D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri S.C. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Tej Ram, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3.2. Instant petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1995

Manager, Jyoti Biri Company Vs. Prescribed Authority/Asstt. Regional L ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-10-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Minimum wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20(3)

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ290All; (1996)1UPLBEC354

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Tripathi, Adv.

D.S. Sinha, J. 1. Heard Sri S.C. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Tej Ram, learned Standing Counsel representing the Prescribed Authority and the Assistant Regional Labour Commissioner, Gorakhpur, the Respondent No. 1,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 05 1998

Smt. Rekha Rani Chaturvedi Vs. Dr. Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-05-1998

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC29

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Tripathi and ;V.D. Ojha, Advs.

B.K. Roy and R.K. Mahajan, JJ.1. In this appeal under Section 19 of theFamily Courts Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the wife assails the validity of the order dated 28.3.1997 passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2002

Moti Prasad Agrawal and ors. Vs. Prabandh Nideshak, Pradeshiya Industr ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-16-2002

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22; Constitution of India - Articles 15(3), 15(4) and 16(4)

Reported in : [2002(94)FLR827]; [2003]44SCL536(All); (2002)2UPLBEC1942

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Tripathi, Adv.

M. Katju, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition has been filed against the impugned recovery certificate dated 20.6.2002 (Annexure-1 to the petition) for Rs. 47,52,683.55p. 3. Krishna Synthetics Ltd. is a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2000

Devi Prasad Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-01-2000

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 16 and 11(1)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ637

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Tripathi, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J.1. This revision is preferred by the revisionist against the judgment and order dated 23-5-1984 passed by III Addl. Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar whereby he dismissed the appeal and confirmed the judgment and order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2004

Prem Dayal Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-17-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 4K; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 2A; Limitation Act, 1963; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1946

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC78

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Tripathi, Adv.

V.C. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri S.C. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.D. Dubey, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-workman for quashing the award dated 30.6.1998...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1999

Manohar Lal and Others Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer/Vth Addit ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-08-1999

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 12(1)

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC704

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Khare, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J. 1. This writ petition Is directed against the order dated 19.12.1998 passed by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer, respondent No. 1. declaring the disputed accommodation as vacant.2. Briefly stated the facts are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 1986

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Orissa Forest Corporation Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-29-1986

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1987)(13)LC896Tri(Delhi)

1. Shri Thakur, S.D.R., for the department submits that in these cases the department is the appellant and the Orissa Forest Corporation Ltd. is the respondent and all these appeals have arisen out of order-in-appeal Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 1995

State Bank of India, Kanpur Vs. Deepak Malviya and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-09-1995

Subject : Banking

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 142, 171, 172, 174 and 176; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1996All165; [1998]91CompCas569(All)

Advocate for Appellant : N.B. Singh, Adv.

1. This is defendant'ssecond appeal. The facts necessary, for the decision of the appeal are as under :Deepak Malviya a minor aged about 14 years, Alok Malviya a minor aged about 12 years, Km. Reeta a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial