Advanced Search Results
Sitaram Jaipuria and ors. Vs. Banwarilal Jaipuria
Kolkata
Sep-17-1971
MRTP
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; ;Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2 and 22; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 34(2), 149 and 173(2); ;Industrial Development and Regulation Act, 1969 - Section 11
AIR1972Cal105,76CWN161
S.C. Sen, ;R.C. Nag and ;Sunil Mukherjee, Advs.
P.B. Mukharji, C.J.1. This is an appeal from an interlocutory order of S.K. Mukherjea, J., dated the 16th March, 1971.2. This was an application in a representative action by a shareholder for an injunction restraining the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOfu Lynx Ltd. Vs. Simon Carves India Ltd.
Kolkata
Mar-21-1969
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 434(1)
AIR1970Cal418,[1971]41CompCas174(Cal)
S.C. Sen, Adv.
ORDERA.N. Sen, J.1. This is an application by Ofu Lynx Limited (hereinafter referred to as the company) for an order that the petition for winding-up of the company pre-sented by the respondent Simon Carves India Limited...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMd. Sharif Vs. State of Orissa
Supreme Court of India
Jan-06-1995
Criminal
Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C), 1973 - Section 401
1995Supp(3)SCC663
A.M. Ahmadi, C.J.,; M.K. Mukharji and; S.C. Sen, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. Heard counsel on both sides. The main grievance made by the learned counsel for the appellant is that the High Court refused to look...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Anjali Anil Rangari Vs. Anil Kripasagar Rangari and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-09-1997
FamilyCriminal
Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 97; Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 - Section 25; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Section 6
(1997)10SCC342
S.C. Sen and; S.P. Kurdukar, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material produced before us. This writ petition is filed by Mrs Anjali Anil Rangari, the mother of two minor children,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector of Printing, Stationery and Publication, Orissa Vs. Prakash C ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-16-1997
Labour and Industrial
(1997)11SCC596
J.S. Verma,; S.C. Sen and; S.P. Kurdukar, JJ.1. The respondent was initially appointed a casual Helper in 1979. Later, by an order dated 12-1-1983 (Annexure “B”), he was selected for appointment to the post of Helper...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurlidhar and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-06-1995
Criminal
Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C), 1973 - Sections 482, 397, 401
1995Supp(3)SCC662
A.M. Ahmadi, C.J; M.K. Mukharji and; S.C. Sen, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. It appears that the impugned order dated 3-1-1994 was obtained by filing a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure without...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Madras Telephones Scheduled Castes and Schedu ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-13-1997
Service
(1997)10SCC226
Shri. R. Venugopal Reddy
B.P. Jeevan Reddy and; S.C. Sen, JJ.1. Though the respondents are served, no one appears for them. We have heard Shri R. Venugopal Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant - Union of India.2. In the Posts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinternational Coal Corporation Vs. Pure Sitalpur Coal Concern Ltd.
Kolkata
Jun-21-1971
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 21; ;Partnership Act, 1932 - Section 19; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 402
AIR1972Cal45
Mitter and ;S.C. Sen, Advs.
ORDERRamendra Mohan Datta, J.1. A terms of settlement is sought to be put in whereby all disputes in respect of the above suit have been agreed to be referred to arbitration as per agreement dated July...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRagunath Prasad Jhunjhunwala and anr. Vs. Hind Overseas Private Ltd. Overruled
Kolkata
Sep-25-1969
Company
Companies Act, 1862 - Sections 79(5) and 129; ;Partnership Act, 1819 - Section 35; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1948 - Sections 210 and 222; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Section 169
[1971]41CompCas308(Cal)
A.K. Sen, ;S.C. Sen and ;R.C. Nag, Advs.
Mukherjea, J.1. These two appeals are directed against a judgment and order dated 6th July, 1967, by which the learned trial judge disposed of two applications. In the first application, namely, Company Application No. 183 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Bharat Commerce and Industries Ltd.
Kolkata
Nov-16-1971
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 17 and 17(3)
[1973]43CompCas162(Cal)
S.C. Sen, Adv.
ORDERRamendra Mohan Datta, J. 1. This is an application for the confirmation by the court of the special resolution passed by the above named company relating to the proposed change of its registered office from Calcutta...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »