Advanced Search Results
Hardas Singh and Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India and anr
Delhi
May-09-2011
Constitution
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Section 9; Constitution of India - Article 226
Mr S.C.Nigam, Adv.
1. By way of present petition, petitioners have challenged a finding on a preliminary issue by the Estate Officer, a statutory authority under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSushil Kumar Vs. Bhagwanti Devi and anr.
Delhi
Nov-28-1988
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)
1989(16)DRJ289; 1989RLR61
Sunil Malhotra and; S.C. Nigam, Advs
P.N. Nag, J. (1) This judgment will dispose of both the appeals as these are inter-connected and facts involved in them are almost the same and concern the same premises. (2) The facts in S.A.O. 374/78...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrown Wheels P. Ltd. Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.
Delhi
Jun-11-2007
Electricity
Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 42(5)
2007(97)DRJ536; 2007LC(DEL)1423
S.C. Nigam, Adv
S. Muralidhar, J.1. The petitioner is running a small scale industry for manufacturing of automobile parts at premises No. 77 Maya Puri, Delhi and it has a sanctioned industrial power connection of 120 HP (89.2 KWs)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Madan Lal JaIn Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
Dec-20-2000
Property
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972
2001IIAD(Delhi)430; 89(2001)DLT491
Mr. Jagmohan Sadharwal,; Sr. Adv., Mr. S.C. Nigam, Adv
ORDERARUN KUMAR, J.1. The petitioner claims to be a displaced person who migrated to India on partition of the country. After coming to Delhi he unauthorisedly occupied government land on Mirdard Road, Minto Road, New Delhi....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. P.N. Khanna and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-01-2002
Labour and IndustrialConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10A
2003(1)AWC551; [2003(96)FLR541]
R. Saxena, Adv.
Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.2. The petitioner U.P. State Electricity Board (now Corporation) has challenged the award dated 9.2.1989 passed by the Industrial Tribunal II. U.P., Lucknow,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mangilal JaIn and S.C. Nigam
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-01-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2)
[1997]223ITR98(MP)
D.D. Vyas, Adv.
A.R. Tiwari, J. 1. The applicant (Commissioner of Income-tax, Bhopal) has filed these applications under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), seeking a direction to the Tribunal to state the cases...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKundanlal JaIn Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Delhi
Feb-21-1984
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rules 2, 3, 4(2) and 4(3) - Order 41, Rule 21
1984RLR255
G.L. Rawal and; Sushma Relhan, Advs
M.L. Jain, J. (1) The appellant filed a suit for injunction against the respondent Mcd restraining them from dispossessing him from certain disputed premises. The suit was decreed by the learned Sub-Judge on 7.11.81. The Corporation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Saurashtra Color Tones Pvt. Ltd and anr.
Delhi
Jul-02-2009
ElectricityCommercial
Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1988 - Sections 17, 29(1) and 29(4); Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 72 and 75 to 83; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 21(2), 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 49A, 50 and 51; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act 2000 - Sections 11, 19, 20, 28, 28(2), 61 and 63(2); Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 27; Delhi Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules 2001 - Rule 10(2); Electricity Supply Code
AIR2010Delhi14; 161(2009)DLT28
A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv.,; Amar Gupta,; Amit Kapur,;
Ajit Prakash Shah, C.J.RELEVANT FACTS1. The appellant is a distribution company engaged in distribution of electricity in its area of supply under a statutory licence issued by the respondent No. 2, Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBal Kishan Giri Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
May-28-2014
Land Acquisition
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.555 OF2010Bal Kishan Giri …Appellant Versus State of U.P. …Respondent JUDGMENT Dr. B.S. Chauhan,J.1. In this appeal, impugned judgment and order dated 5.2.2010 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBal Kishan Giri Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
May-28-2014
Land Acquisition
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.555 OF2010Bal Kishan Giri …Appellant Versus State of U.P. …Respondent JUDGMENT Dr. B.S. Chauhan,J.1. In this appeal, impugned judgment and order dated 5.2.2010 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »