Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s c kapoor · Page 1 of about 123 results (0.209 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 07 1996

Indian Oil Corporation Vs. Arun Massey and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-07-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (1997)115PLR349

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor, Sr. Adv. and; Ashish Kapoor, Adv.

R.L. Anand, J.1. By this judgment I dispose of two Regular Second Appeals Nos. 1064 and 1531 of 1996 as both the appeals have arisen from the judgment and decree dated 6.2.1996 passed by the Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2004

i.B.P. Company and anr. Vs. Uday Singh Jeet Ram and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-12-2004

Subject : Contract

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2)

Reported in : AIR2004P& H300; (2004)138PLR465

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor, Sr. Counsel and; Ashish Kapoor, Adv.

ORDERM.M. Kumar, J.1. This petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, 'the Code') prays for quashing order dated 6-12-2003 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Bahadurgarh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2005

Green Roadways and anr. Vs. Santokh Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-16-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 2

Reported in : (2005)141PLR662

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor and; Ashish Kapoor, Advs.

Viney Mittal, J.1. The tenants are the petitioners before this Court.2. The landlord Santokh Singh had sought the ejectment of the tenants from the premises in question on the ground of personal necessity. The learned Rent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 19 2003

Gurbachan Singh and anr. Vs. Bahadur Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-19-2003

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2)

Reported in : (2004)136PLR679

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor, Senior Adv. and; Ashish Kapoor and; G.S. Ga

V.K. Bali, J.1. Even though, it is a judgment of reversal that has been impugned in the present revision petition, there does not appear to be any material illegality or impropriety in the order passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 1995

M/S. Gammon India Limited Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board and Other ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-21-1995

Subject : CompanyCommercial

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 79; Punjab State Electricity Board Purchase Regulations, 1981 - Regulation 8; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7 and 10; Constitution of India, Articles 14, 19, 226 and 299; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR1997P& H43; (1997)115PLR309

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor, Sr. Adv. and; Arun Jain and; Raman Sharma

ORDERV. K. Bali, J.1. M/s. Gammon India Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, through its area representative and attorney Shri A. K. Mirchandani, styles the contract given to M/s. National Building Construction Corporation -...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2000

Nanak Cnand Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-15-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 - Sections 17(5)

Reported in : (2000)126PLR726

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor and; Ashish Kapoor, Advs.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Whether Mrs. sumita Misra Singh, the them Administrator, HUDA, Faridabad had the jurisdiction to review/re-call, directly or indirectly, the order dated 31.7.1995 passed by her predecessor vide which he had dismissed the appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 1993

Gian Chand and ors. Vs. the Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-01-1993

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 - Sections 9 and 9(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1995)109PLR267

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor, Sr. Adv. and; Ashish Kapoor, Adv.

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. Vasanda Ram, the father of the present petitioner was a tenant on agricultural land measuring 120 Kanals 9 marlas. He having died, his three sons viz. the present petitioners stepped into his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 1996

Parminder Singh and ors. Vs. Avtar Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-09-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 21, Rule (1)(3)

Reported in : (1996)113PLR619

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor, Sr. Adv.,; Gurmohan Singh and; Ashish Kapoo

Sat Pal, J.1. During the course of arguments, Mr. S.C. Kapoor, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner drew ray attention to order XXI, Rule 1, sub-rule (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1993

Sudesh Vs. Mahabir Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-10-1993

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1) and 23(1)

Reported in : II(1994)DMC454

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor, Sr. Adv. and; Ashish Kapoor, Adv

A.P. Chowdhri, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Rohtak, dated January 27, 1988, whereby the respondent-husband's petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2004

Karan Singh Vs. Bhagwani and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-01-2004

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 54

Reported in : (2004)138PLR227

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Kapoor, Senior Adv. and; Harminderjeet Singh, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is defendants appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below. It has been concurrently found by both...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial