Advanced Search Results

H.L. BhasIn and ors. Vs. A.K. Das and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Railway Board Secretariat Service Rules, 1969 - Articles 9 and 14

Reported in : 1983(4)DRJ206; 1983LabIC1603

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Gupta,; L.R. GOEL,; G.L. Sanghvi,;

B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) This judgment will dispose of L.P.A. No. 78 of 1978 and Civil Writ Petition No. 378 of 1982, wherein the common question which arises is with regard to the validity of the amendment...

Azaz HussaIn Vs. Jandk State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1989 - Sections 498A and 561A

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2582,2003(1)JKJ763

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Nayar and; S.C. Gupta, Advs.

B.L. Bhat, J. 1. Azaz Hussain petitioner has approached this court for quashing of FIR No. 34 of 2001 dated 14.9.2001 of Police Station Kalakote and the subsequent proceedings initiated in this behalf by the learned...

J and K State Forest Corporation Vs. Mohd. Rashid

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Section 30

Reported in : 2005(2)JKJ154

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Gupta, AAG

S.K. Gupta, J.1. This appeal is directed against the award dated 24.4.2004 propounded by Commissioner Workmen's Compensation Act (Assistant Labour Commissioner) Kishtwar. By the aforesaid award an amount of Rs. 60,000/- has been awarded as compensation...

A.K. Doora Vs. Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 44(1991)DLT665; (1992)IILLJ460Del

Advocate for Appellant : Swatantar Kumar,; Geeta Mittal,; S.C. Gupta and;

Mahinder Narain, J. (1) By this order, I propose to dispose of Civil Writ Petition No. 3406 of 1990, filed by the petitioner, Lt.Col. A.K.Dogra(retd.), whereby he seeks an appropriate writ, order or direction for setting...

Harbans Lal Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 409

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ646

Advocate for Appellant : Harbans Lal, Adv. in Cr. I.A. 25/98,; S.C. Gupta, AAG in Acq. Appeal Nos. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 o

B.L. Bhat, J.1. The aforementioned Criminal Appeals arise out of the judgment and order recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Udhampur all dated 28.11.1998 in session File Nos. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.2....

State of J and K Vs. Phangi

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 174 and 374; ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ216

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Gupta, AAG

S.K. Gupta, J.1. Proceedings in case entitled State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Phangi, in terms of Section 374 of Cr. P.C. have been received from the learned Sessions Judge, Udhampur, for confirmation of sentence of...

M.L. Arora and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 98

Reported in : ILR1992Delhi346

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Gupta,; L.R. Goel,; R.K. Anand,;

Dalveer Bhandari, J.(1) This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questions the legality of circular No, 1|19|89|WSU|Seniority|4308 dated 24-1-1989 whereunder Additional Deputy Commissioner, Water Supply and Sewage Disposal Undertaking, Municipal Corporation of...

Mukesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Direct Taxation

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. C. Gupta

NAGENDRA RAI, J. :As a common question of law is involved in both the cases, though they have been heard on two different dates, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. In both the...

Raj Singh Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Government Grants Act, 1895 - Sections 3; Cantonments Land Administration Rules, 1937 - Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1973Delhi169

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Gupta, Adv

V.S. Deshpande, J.1. Ubi jus Ibi remedium says the maxim. If so the converse should also be true. namely 'where there is no right; there is no remedy.' It is also equally turn that even where...

Arvind Construction Co. and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 35B and 358

Reported in : 38(1989)DLT129

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Gupta,; L.R. Goel and; Vikramjit Sen, Advs

S.N. Sapra, J. (1) By the present application, being I.A. No. 5423/88. defendants have prayed to the Court to recall its order, passed on August 8 1988 and permit them to defend the suit on such...