Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s c datta · Page 1 of about 119 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 20 1995

Rishiram Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-20-1995

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B, 306 and 498A

Reported in : I(1995)DMC558

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Datta, Adv.

N.P. Singh. J.1. The appellant was tried for the offence under Sections 304B and 306 of the IPC by the Sessions Judge. Betul in Sessions Trial No. 78/89, on the allegation that he had subjected his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1998

Manindra Kumar Ray and ors. Vs. Bhubaneshwar Development Authority and ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-11-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Orissa Development Authorities Act, 1982 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1998Ori141

Advocate for Appellant : L. Mohapatra, ;B.K. Nayak, ;G.K. Nayak and ;G.K. Bohera, Advs.

Pasayat, J.1. These four writ applications arc inter-linked and arc disposed of by this common judgment. Petitioner in each case had applied for permission in terms of the Orissa Development Authorities Act, 1982 (in short, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1988

Smt. Shishuwala Pal and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-31-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 9 and 10; Citizenship Rules, 1956 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 6, 7 and 226

Reported in : AIR1989MP254; 1989MPLJ121

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Agrawal, Adv.

Y.B. Suryavanshi, J. 1. In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed for a writ of mandamus restraining the respondents from treating them as Foreign Nationals of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 20 1997

Kirtan Bihari Sahoo Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, United Bank of ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Aug-20-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 86(1998)CLT789; (1999)IIILLJ611Ori

ORDER1. August 12, 1997 Heard in Part.Call this matter on August 19, 1997. Learned counsel for the opposite parties shall obtain instruction as to whether the opposite party No. 1 is willing to get the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1966

Calcutta National Bank Ltd. Vs. Rangaroon Tea Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-17-1966

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Defence of India Rules, 1939 - Rules 94A and 95; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 23; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 8 - Order 8, Rule 5; ;Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 109, 109(1), 109A and 120; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 125, 127 and 141; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 58

Reported in : AIR1967Cal294

ORDERS.P. Mitra, J.1. The plaintiff is a Bank in liquidation. In the plaint it is alleged that on the 30th August, 1944, the plaintiff lent and advanced Rs. 2,75,000 to Ranjit Bose, the Original Defendant No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1995

Vinod Tiwari and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-13-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 438, 438(1), 439 and 439(1)

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ247

Advocate for Appellant : R.L. Gupta, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. This application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') for cancellation of blanket order of bail passed under Section 438 of the Code by Shri Rampal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1998

Mahesh Agarwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-06-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 7 and 7B

Reported in : AIR1998MP197; 1998(1)MPLJ643

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Gupta, Adv.

ORDERTej Shankar, J. 1. The petitioner Mahesh Agarwal prayed for a direction to the respondents to connect the telephone connection and grant the facilities immediately. It has been alleged that he holds a telephone connection No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1997

Pradip Kumar Das Vs. Smt. Abanti Das and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Aug-14-1997

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96(3) - Order 1A, Rule 43 - Order 43, Rule 1A(2)

Reported in : AIR1998Ori26

Advocate for Appellant : Mira Ghose, Adv.

Pasayat, J. 1. A pointt regarding maintainabilitty of the appeal has been raised on the ground that the appeal is incompetent in view of the bar imposed under Section 96(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1998

Samreeti SwaIn Vs. Utkal University and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Aug-28-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(II)OLR385

Advocate for Appellant : N.B. Biswal, ;R.N. Biswal, ;D.K. Biswal, ;B.B. Rout, ;R.K. Pradhan, ;S.K. Mishra, ;B.K. Choudhury, ;S.K. Dash and ;D.C. Mohanty

1. The petitioner in this writ application seeks for a direction to the Utkal University-opposite party No. I to declare her rank/position in Bachelor of Arts (Sociology Honours) of three year degree course examination, 1992 as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1996

Dr. Hemanta Chandra Panda and ors., Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Orissa and ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-09-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226

Reported in : AIR1997Ori98

Advocate for Appellant : B.M. Patnaik, ;P.K. Choudhury, ;S. Mohanty, ;B.S. Misra-2, ;S.C. Kar, ;M.R. Mishra, ;A. Ch. Mohanty, ;S.K. Mund, ;D.P. Das, ;J.K. Panda, ;S. Mishra-2, ;S.N. Misra, ;R.C. Praharaj, ;B. Das and ;K.K. Mo

R.K. Patra, J. 1. In this batch of petitions the controversy veers round the admission to Post-graduate Courses in the three Government Medical Colleges of the State. For the sake of convenience, they were heard together...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial