Advanced Search Results
Umesh Chand Bhilwar Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Nov-17-1998
Service
Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 - Sections 30; Prathma Bank (Staff) Service Regulations, 1980 - Regulations 8, 8(1), (2) and (3), 9 and 10, 10(2), 17(1) and 30; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 29; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975 - Rules 5 and 6; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Sugar Factories Federation Service Rules, 1976; Indian Police Service (Probation) Rules, 1954
1999(2)AWC943; (1999)IILLJ1093All; (1999)1UPLBEC27
Rajendra Prasad Singh, ;S.C. Budhwar and ;R.M. Suggi, Advs.
G.P. Mathur, J. on behalf of D. P. Mohapatra, C.J. also. 1. The petitioner, a Probationary Officer tn a Bank, has challenged the order by which his services were terminated. There was a difference of opinion...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., Bombay Vs. State of Uttar Pra ...
Allahabad
Sep-12-1984
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 29 and 30
AIR1985All93
S.C. Budhwar, Adv.
A. Banerji, J.1. These two First Appeals from Orders raise identical questions of law and can, therefore, be conveniently decided by a common order.2. First Appeal from Order No. 445 of 1977 arises out of a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Shiromani Mishra and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad
Apr-22-2000
Service
Uttar Pradesh Police Service Rules, 1942 - Rules 5, 17 and 21(1) and (5); Uttar Pradesh Service Rules, 1942; Constitution of India - Article 226
2000(3)AWC2348; [2000(86)FLR289]
Sudhir Agrawal and ;S.C. Budhwar, Advs.
R.R.K. Trivedi and M. C. Jain, JJ.1. By means of this writ petition, petitioners. Ram Shiromani Mishra and Shariq Alvi who were serving as Deputy Superintendents of Police have challenged the action of the State Government...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Tannery and Footwear Corporation of India Limited
Allahabad
Aug-18-1998
SICA
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 20
[2003]115CompCas332(All)
Vinay Khare and ;Somesh Khare, Advs. for TAFCO Officers' Association, ;S.C. Budhwar, Adv. assisted by ;Yashwant Varma, Adv., ;Narendra Mohan, Adv. for TAFCO Janta Mazdoor Union and ;Sandeep Saxena, Ad
A.K. Banerji, J.1. The Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR in short) had vide its order dated February 14, 1995, recommended the winding up of the company Tannery and Footwear Corporation of India Limited ('TAFCO'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArvind Kumar Vs. Principal Director, Process and Product Development C ...
Allahabad
Nov-15-2002
ConstitutionService
Constitution of India - Article 16
2003(1)AWC601
S.C. Budhwar and ;Sudhir Agarwal, Advs.
G.P. Mathur, J. 1. There is a Society known as Process and Product Development Centre, which is functioning at Agra. The Society is wholly owned and managed by Government of India through the Ministry of Industries....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. M.C. Yadav Vs. Director of Education (Higher Education) Allahabad ...
Allahabad
Mar-30-2001
Service
U.P. Higher Education Service Commission Act, 1980 - Sections 12, 12(1), (2), (3), (4), 13, 13(1), (2) and (4); U.P. Higher Education Service Commission Act, 1983
2001(2)AWC1383; (2001)2UPLBEC1435
A.P. Tiwari, ;S.S. Tiwari, ;S.C. Budhwar and ;C.B. Yadav, Advs.
S.R. Singh, J. 1. Present petition has been instituted canvassing the validity of the order dated 25.8.1999 by means of which the Director of Higher Education has recalled his earlier order dated 17.8.1999 whereby the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCapt. Satendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-07-2002
Service
Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 13A
2002(2)AWC1293; [2002(93)FLR555]
B.N. Agrawal, ;Sanjay Agarwal, ;S.C. Budhwar and V. Budhwar, Advs.
M. Katju and R. Tiwari, JJ.1. Heard Sri S. C. Budhwar, learned senior counsel, Sri V. Budhwar learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sandeep Saxena, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner has challenged the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAti Ahmad Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board and Others
Allahabad
Jul-23-1999
Service
Uttar Pradesh Recruitment in Service (Determination of Date of Birth) Rules, 1974
1999(3)AWC2623; (2000)1UPLBEC543
S.C. Budhwar and ;Arun Tandon, Advs.
D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner was asked to retire on attainment of 58 years of age by a notice contained in Annexure-7 to the writ petition being dated 21st August, 1995 informing him that he would...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskZainul AbdIn Vs. State of U.P. Through Collector and ors.
Allahabad
May-29-1997
Service
State Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 5; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65, 66 and 74; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 279, 304A and 429; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Organisation (Abolition of Posts and Absorption of Employees) Rules, 1982
(1997)3UPLBEC1922
D. Narain and ;S.C. Budhwar, Advs.
R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. Facts giving rise to this writ petition are that petitioner Zainul Abdin was serving as confirmed Driver in Uttar Pradesh Government Roadways at Jaunpur Depot. While petitioner was driving passenger bus No. U...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArvind Kumar Vs. Cegat
Allahabad
Aug-16-2000
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11B, 77, 111, 112 and 129E; Constitution of India - Article 226
2001(130)ELT732(All)
S.C. Budhwar, Sr. Counsel
S. Rafat Alam, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has come up for quashing of the order of the Custom Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Northern Bench,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »