Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s c agarwala · Page 1 of about 39 results (0.073 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 08 1969

Hori Lal and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-1969

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 307, 320 and 326; Evidence Act - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1970SC1969; 1970CriLJ1665; (1970)1SCC8; [1970]2SCR237

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Garg,; S.C. Agarwal and; Uma Dutta, Advs

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court setting aside the conviction of Hori Lal and Bisram under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1973

Dharam Das and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-18-1973

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417 and 417(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 203, 302 and 323

Reported in : AIR1973SC2195; 1973CriLJ1181; (1973)2SCC216; 1973(5)LC656(SC)

Dua, J.1. In this appeal by special leave, Dharam Das and Ram Das sons of Ram Adharm and Raja Ram s/o Chunnua have challenged their conviction by the Allahabad High Court after allowing the state appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1966

Gopi Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-1966

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 30(1)

Reported in : AIR1967SC241; 1967CriLJ279

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.C. Agarwala

J.R. Mudholkar, J.1. The petitioner who has been detained in the Central Jail, Jaipur under an order dated January 19, 1965 made by the District Magistrate, Ganganagar under Clause (b) of Sub-rule (1) of Rule 30...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 04 1966

The Barium Chemicals Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Company Law Board and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-04-1966

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10B, 10E, 10(E)(1), 10(E)(4),10(E)(5), 10(E)(6), 27, 234, 235-251, 637, 637(1), 637(2) and 642(1); CompanyLaw; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1963; CentralProvinces and Berar Public Safety Act, 1948 - Sections 2; PreventiveDetention Act, 1950 - Sections 3; Defence of IndiaAct; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections10(1) and 12(5); Banking Companies Act, 1949 -Sections 38(3); Companies Act, 1862 - Sections 165; CriminalProcedure Code, 1973- Sections 6; Taxation onIncome (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947 - Sections 5(4); IncomeTax (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 8(1); UttarPradesh Road Transport Act, 1951; Parent Act; Companies(Amendment) Act, 1965 - Sections 4A and 10E; CompanyLaw Board (Procedure) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Def

Reported in : AIR1967SC295; [1966]36CompCas639(SC); [1967]1SCR898; [1966]SuppSCR311

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 381 of 1966. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated October 7, 1965 of the Punjab High Court (Circuit Bench) at Delhi in Civil Writ No. 1626-C...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1973

Amanullah Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-12-1973

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 418 and 421; Constitution of India - Article 136; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 304 and 323

Reported in : AIR1973SC1370; 1973CriLJ1140; (1973)2SCC81

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.C. Agarwala

I.D. Dua, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave. The appellant and Bashir ex-zamindars were tried in the court of the Second Temporary Sessions Judge, Azamgarh on a charge under Sections 304/34, I.P.C. for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2013

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Vs. M/S C.L.JaIn Woolen ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-01-2013

Subject : Company

CP No.205 of 2002. ::-1-:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CP No.205 of 2002 [O&M].Date of decision: February 01, 2013. M/s Mosenthals Wool & Mohair S.A.[Pty.].Ltd...Petitioner v. M/s...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1974

Haradhan Saha Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-1974

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 87, 88 and 89

Reported in : AIR1974SC2154; 1974CriLJ1479; (1975)3SCC198; [1975]1SCR778

Advocate for Appellant : R.K.Garg,; S.C.Agarwala,; S.S. Bhatnagar,;

A.N. Ray, C.J.1. The Constitutional validity of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 being Act No. 26 of 1971 is challenged in these petitions.2. First, it is said that the law of preventive detention is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1975

Pratap Singh Vs. Rajinder Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-1975

Subject : Election

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 16, Rule 14; Representation of the People Act, 1951; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 11 and 165

Reported in : AIR1975SC1045; (1975)1SCC535; [1975]3SCR584

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Garg,; S.C. Agarwala,; V. J. Francis and;

1. Pritam Singh, the appellant before us under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), was elected at an election held on 11-3-1972 for the Haryana State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1977

Cyril E. Fernandes Vs. Sr. Maria Lydia and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-1977

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR1977SC2145; [1977(35)FLR216]; 1977LabIC1549; (1977)4SCC94; [1978]1SCR388; 1977(9)LC595(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Garg,; S.C. Agarwala and; V.J. Francis, Advs

A.C. Gupta, J.1. The appellant was employed as a teacher in the Presentation Convent High School, Margao, Goa. The school is recognised by the Department of Education of the Government of the Union Territory of Goa,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1972

State of Bihar Vs. Deokaran Nenshi and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-24-1972

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 66 and 79; Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1926 - Regulation 3

Reported in : AIR1973SC908; 1973(0)BLJR741; 1973CriLJ347; [1973(26)FLR77]; (1972)2SCC890; [1973]1SCR1004

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Agarwala, Adv

J.M. Shelat, J.1. Section 66 of the Mines Act, 1952 provides that any person omitting -inter alia to furnish any return, notice etc. in the prescribed form or manner or at or within the prescribed time...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial