Advanced Search Results

Manik Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

A.H. Joshi, J. 1. Appellant herein was charged in Sessions Case No. 3 of 2004 by 4th Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for pouring kerosene on his wife Sangita, setting her fire on 10.10.2003, at...

Chandramohan Pandurang Kajbaje Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Civil Services Classification and Recruitment Rules, 1939 - Rule 2(B); Constitution of India - Article 309

Reported in : 2008(1)BomCR705; JT2008(1)SC272; 2008(1)SCALE138; 2008(2)SLJ460(SC); 2008AIRSCW619; 2008LABIC779

Advocate for Appellant : Sameer Parekh and; Rukhmini Bobde, Advs. for;Parekh & Co

H.K. Sema, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.10.2000 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 3024 of 1997.2. This case has a chequered...

Hardas Singh and Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Section 9; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr S.C.Nigam, Adv.

1. By way of present petition, petitioners have challenged a finding on a preliminary issue by the Estate Officer, a statutory authority under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as...

The Lord Krishna Sugar Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Union of India and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Sugar Export Promotion Act, 1958 - Sections 5 to 8; Sugar (Control) Order, 1955

Reported in : AIR1959SC1124; [1960]1SCR39

ORIGINAl, JUTRISDICTION : Petitions Nos. 9 and 14,of 1959. Petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. A.V. Viswanatha Sastri, and G. C. Mathur, for the petitioners in Petition...

Hori Lal and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 307, 320 and 326; Evidence Act - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1970SC1969; 1970CriLJ1665; (1970)1SCC8; [1970]2SCR237

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Garg,; S.C. Agarwal and; Uma Dutta, Advs

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court setting aside the conviction of Hori Lal and Bisram under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. and...

Kirtan Sharatkumar Gandhi Vs. Gujarat Higher Secondary Education Board

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Higher Secondary Certificate Examination Regulations, 1977 - Regulation 19A

Reported in : AIR1995Guj217

Advocate for Appellant : Hardik Raval, Adv. for; Y.N. Oza, Adv.

ORDERN.N. Mathur, J.1. Rule.2. M. C. Bhatt waives service of Rule for respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Y. M. Thakkar waives service for respondent No. 3.3. By was of this Special Civil Application under...

Cit Vs. Malwa Vanaspati and Chemical Co. Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]142TAXMAN158(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : R.L. Jain, for the Revenue S.C. Goyal, for the Assessee.

ORDERThe decision rendered in this Reference application shall also govern the disposal of other two references being CIT v. Vippy Solvex Producis Ltd (IT Reference No. 69 of 1997) and CIT v. Vippy Solvex Products Ltd....

Ferro Concrete Construction (India) (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]144TAXMAN885(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Bagadia & D.K. Chhabra, for the Assessee. R.L. Jain & Ku. V. Mandlik, for the Revenue.

ORDERSapre, J. This is an Income-Tax Reference made at the instance of assessee under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act in R.A. Nos. 48,49 and 50/Ind./97 which arise out of ITA Nos. 902 and 221/Ind./95...

Ashok M. Patel Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2006]153TAXMAN518(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Bagadia & D.K. Chhabra, for the Assessee R.L. Jain & Ku. Veena Mandlik, for the Revenue

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.The decision rendered in this appeal shall govern. disposal of other connected appeal being I.T.A. No. 13 of 2003, because both these appeals involve identical point and secondly, both the appeals are filed by...

Kothari and Company Vs. Cit

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)204CTR(MP)298

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Bagadia with D.K. Chhabra, for the Assessee A.P. Patankar, for the Revenue

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.This is an appeal filed by the assessee under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter for brevity called 'the Act'), against an order dated 9-4-2001, passed by Tribunal, Indore in ITA...