Advanced Search Results

Sunil Kumar Sharma Vs. State (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13, 13(2) and 20; Evidence Act - Sections 5 and 105; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT407; I(2007)DMC654; 2007(95)DRJ347

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv

S.N. Aggarwal, J.1. The appellant, before he was entrapped in a corruption case on 2.11.1994, was working as an Inspector in Delhi Police and was posted as Chowki in-charge at Police Post Sarita Vihar, New Delhi....

Bharat Bhushan vs.state Through c.b.i.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Uday Gupta, Mr. Shivani Lal, Mr. M.K. Tripathi, Mr. Hiren Dasan

$~R-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A1432000 Decided on:13. h December, 2018 BHARAT BHUSHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Uday Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Shivani Lal, Mr. M.K. Tripathi & Mr. Hiren...

V.K. Verma Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.B. Andley, Mr. M. Shamikh, Mr. R.V. Sinha

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No. 293/2003 Reserved on:16. h May, 2013 Decided on:22. d July, 2013 % V.K. VERMA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. with...

Subhash Chand Chauhan Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 7 and 120B; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20

Reported in : 117(2005)DLT187; 2005(79)DRJ644

Advocate for Appellant : Siddharth Aggarwal and; Smriti Sinha, Advs. in Crl. A. 467/2002 and;

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Appellants, Subhash Chand Chauhan and Kanti Kumar were working as Junior Engineer and Khalasi respectively with the DDA. In December 1988, both were posted in Rohini Project Division IX, DDA. Adesh Mittal (PW-3)...

Satish Chander Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 27, 13(1)(d), 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1870 (IPC) - Sections 167, 192, 193, 196, 465, 466, 471

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Chandra; Mr. Manoj Bansal, Advs.

1. The appellant who is the accused in the instant case has preferred an appeal under section 27 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as P.C. Act) read with section 374 of...

Parsadi Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 313; Evidence Act - Sections 58; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2004CriLJ104

Advocate for Appellant : G.C. Saxena, ;Kundan Singh, ;Shamumuddin Khan and ;M.W. Siddiqui, Advs.

M.C. Jain, J.1. Appellant Parsadi has challenged the order of his conviction and sentences passed on 12-2-1987 by Sri S.R. Bhargava, the then Sessions Judge, Bareilly in Sessions Trial No. 89 of 1985. He has been...

Rajesh Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 100(4)

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1814; 1989(3)Crimes638; 1989RLR281

1. The appellant has come up in appeal, feeling aggrieved by his conviction for offence under S. 21 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short the Act), by judgment dated 1st April,...

Vijay Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT(Cri)23; 1995CriLJ2599; 1995(32)DRJ671

Advocate for Appellant : Rajeev Awasthi and; P.S. Sharma, Advs

M.S.A. Siddiqui, J. (1) The appellant Vijay alias Hanuman was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act')...

Jautam Alias Andhi and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4646

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Wali, Adv.

M.C. Jain, J.1. There are two appellants Jautam alias Andhi and Har Chand who have preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 17-12-1981 passed by V Additional Sessions Judge, Azamgarh in S.T. No. 97...

Natthi Ram Vs. District Judge, Dehradun and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 3, 13, 22, 36, 36(1), (2), (2A), (4) and (6); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC641; (2000)1UPLBEC904

Advocate for Appellant : Manoj Mishra and ;Ranjeet Saxena, Advs.

ORDERBinod Kumar Roy and Lakshmi Bihari, JJ.1. The petitioner has come up with a prayer to quash Order No-76/91 dated 4.9.1991 passed by the respondent No. 1 (the District & Sessions Judge. Dehradun) under Section 36...