Advanced Search Results
Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Union of India and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-17-2000
Direct Taxation
(2000)160CTR(Raj)331
Vineet Kothari, for the Assessee S. Bhandawat, for the Revenue
ORDERB. J. Shethna, J.The short question involved in this matter is 'whether the conveyance allowance and the additional conveyance allowance can be exempted under section 10(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?' This question is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Babu Khan
Rajasthan
Sep-08-1993
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25F; Rajasthan Famine Relief Works Employees (Exemption from Labour Laws) Act, 1964 - Sections 3
(1994)IILLJ457Raj; 1994(1)WLC371
S.S. Bhandawat, Addl, A.G. and; S.K. Vyas, Addl. Govt. Adv.
ORDERRajendra Saxena, J.1. This review petition has been directed against the judgment dated January 13, 1992 passed by the Division Bench of this Court consisting of Hon'ble Justice Miss. K. Bhatnagar, who has now retired, and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Bank of India Vs. Smt. Sarojini Kumari
Rajasthan
May-14-1998
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Court Act, 1971
1999CriLJ2130; 1998(3)WLC288
P.K. Bhansali, Adv.; S.S. Bhandawat, Adv.
ORDERB.S. Chauhan, J. 1. The instant contempt petition has been filed by the applicant Central Bank of India against Smt. Sarojani Kumari alleging the wilful defiance of the order dated 5-6-91 passed by this Court in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
J.P. Mathur Vs. Cit
Rajasthan
Feb-17-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]133TAXMAN390(Raj)
Yuv Raj Sonel, for the Assessee S. Bhandawat, for the Revenue
ORDERThe petitioner is aggrieved against the demand created by respondent No. 2 of the Rs. 25,313 as demand of income-tax by disallowing the exemption provided under section 10(14) of the Income Tax Act. According to learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Marudhar Hotel (P) Ltd.
Rajasthan
Feb-17-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN403(Raj)
S. Bhandawat, for the Revenue L.R. Mehta, for the Assessee.
ORDERRajesh Balia, J.Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. The following substantial question of law arising out of the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench has been referred to this court in GTA No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYakub Ali Gopal Singh and Party Vs. Dy. Cit
Rajasthan
Aug-01-2003
Direct Taxation
[2004]134TAXMAN677(Raj)
Suresh Ojha, for the Assessee S. Bhandawat, for the Revenue
We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. With respect to the assessment year 1995-96 the notice for reopening under section 148 of the Income Tax Act was given on 14-5-1997. The assessing officer passed a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Abressive India
Rajasthan
Jan-16-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]133TAXMAN389(Raj)
S. Bhandawat, for the Revenue Rajendra Mehta, for the Assessee
ORDERThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur by order dated 12-6-1998 has referred following question under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for opinion of this court :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVed Prakash and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Dec-01-1982
Criminal
1982WLN(UC)345
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment passed by the Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar dated 19-4-1977 by which appellant Ved Prakash was convicted for the offence under Section 379, of the Indian Penal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRai Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Oct-16-1985
Criminal
1985(2)WLN707
Jas Raj Chopra, JJ. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Bikaner dated November 12, 1980 whereby the learned lower court has held accused Raichand and Girdhari guilty of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Pushpa Lodha Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Jan-24-2001
Service Law/TerminationService
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16
2001(2)WLC307; 2001(2)WLN420
S.N. Trivedi
ORDERShethna, J.(1). This special appeal is directed against the order dated 21.9.2000 passed by the learned single Judge dismissing the writ petition no. 131/2000 filed by the appellant/petitioner on the ground that the controversy involved in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »