Advanced Search Results

Punjab and Maharashtra Co-op. Bank Ltd. Recovery Department Vs. Puri I ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vohra, Mr. Shah

1. By this petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “the said Arbitration Act), the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award dated 6th September 2011 rejecting the claim made...

Rama Anand Roy Vs. the General Manager, C.L.W. and

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.S. Banerjee

1. This matter was originally filed before the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court as a writ petition in the year 1982 challenging the charge-sheets dated 10.11.70 and 23.2.71, two enquiry reports, two punishment show cause notices dated...

Kamrup Developers (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Deepak Lohia and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10(1), 397 and 398

Advocate for Appellant : S. Banerjee and M. Hazarika, Advs.

Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. An order dated 31.12.2001 passed by the Company Law Board, Principal Bench, New Delhi in a proceeding registered under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act, at the instance of the Respondent No. 1...

Michael Mili Vs. Ifci Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.S. Banerjee

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7959/2013 17th December, 2013 % MICHAEL MILI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.S. Banerjee, Advocate. Versus IFCI LIMITED Through: …Respondent Mr. Dinkar Singh, Advocate. CORAM:...

Jewell Filter Co. Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1969)IILLJ221Cal

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. S. Banerjee

B.C. Mitra, J.1. The petitioner is a sterling company incorporated under the English Companies Act with its registered office in London. It has an Indian branch at Nos. 28 and 30, Chittaranjan Avenue, Calcutta, and a...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Natwarlal Damodardas Soni

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 103, and 165; Evidence Act - Sections 106, 111, 114, 123 and 123(1)

Reported in : AIR1980SC593; 1980CriLJ429; 1980CENCUS85D; 1983(13)ELT1620(SC); (1980)4SCC669; [1980]2SCR340; 1980(12)LC171(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : O.P. Rana and; M.N. Shroff, Advs

R.S. Sarkaria, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment dated October 13, 1972, of the High Court of Bombay.2. Natwarlal, respondent herein, was prosecuted in the Court of the Presidency Magistrate 2nd...

Dr. Sudarshan Mondal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ48CAT

1. Since all these O.As. are similar in nature, they are being taken up together and are being decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience we are taking up O.A. 755/05, the first...

Deboram Manna and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14, 16, 21 and 226;; Recruitment and Leave of Teachers of Primary Schools of West Bengal Rules, 1991 - Rules 8 and 9

Reported in : (1999)1CALLT199(HC),[1999(82)FLR376]

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Balai Lal Sahoo, ;Mr. Ajit Panja and ;Mr. Tushar Kanti Hore, Advs.;Mr. S. Bhuiya and ;Mr. A. Maity, Advs.

M. H. S. Ansari, J. 1. As the two matters raise similar questions for consideration the above writ applications have been taken up analogously and are being disposed of by this common Judgment and order :--In...

Alak Prokash JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CompanyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(6), 237, 388B to 388E and 398; ;Companies Tribunal (Abolition Act), 1967

Reported in : [1973]43CompCas68(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Deb, ;Subrata Roy Choudhury, ;P.L. Khaitan and ;Mahabir Prosad Chowdhury, Advs.

B.C. Mitra, J. 1. The appellant was a director of several joint stock companies incorporated in India, including a company known as BenettColeman and Co. Ltd. He claims to have resigned from the directorship of this...

Soni and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 363, 365, 366 and 376; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 117(2005)DLT135; 2005(79)DRJ654; (2005)140PLR29

Advocate for Appellant : Sachin Chopra, Adv

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Appellants were charged for having committed offences punishable under Sections 363, 365, 366, 376 and Section 120-B IPC. Appellants Rajan, Gomti, Soni and Udal suffered a conviction under Section 376 IPC. appellant Kalyan...