Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s balaji · Page 1 of about 3,063 results (0.544 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 2011

M.A. Shivakumaran and ors. Vs. Sundaram Finance Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 125, 126; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 468, 471 r/w 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Sections 227, 482

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.G. Rajagopalan; Mr.A.S. Balaji, Adv.

ORDER1. By consent of both sides, the matter has been taken up for final hearing.2. The petitioners, who are the accused in a private complaint initiated by the respondent before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2007

A. Lewis and anr. Etc. Vs. M.T. Ramamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-31-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 20, Rule 12

Reported in : AIR2008SC493; (SCSuppl)2008(1)CHN158; 2008(1)KarLJ711; (2008)1MLJ253(SC); 2007(12)SCALE750; 2007AIRSCW7356; 2008(2)CivilLJ499; 2008(1)ICC427; 2008(4)KCCR2669; ILR2008(2)Kar1810

Advocate for Appellant : S. Balaji, Adv

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment dated 13.07.2006 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in R.F.A. Nos. 827 and 718 of 2000 whereby the High...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2009

Oswal Agro Furance Workers Union Through President Vs. Oswal Agro Fura ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-12-2009

Subject : Company

Reported in : [2009]151CompCas528(P& H); (2009)154PLR300

K. Kannan, J.1. The disposal of the property of plant and machinery in the premises of the company-in-liquidation and the resolution of a dispute of inter se claims of purchasers of the property in competitive bids...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 06 2009

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Jhalani Tools (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 434, 450 and 457; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act - Sections 20(1); Companies Court Rules - Rules 272 and 273; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 54(2), 67, 67(1), 90 and 92; Company (Courts) Rules - Rule 272

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT311

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Jhanji and; Ravi Kant Chadha, Sr. Advs.,; Deepak Dhing

Anil Kumar, J.CA No. 710/2007 (BY SIDDHARTH CLUTCHES PVT. LTD.) and CA No. 491/2007 (BY SH. RAJ KISHAN GOEL)1. The applicants Sh. Raj Kishan Goel (CA No. 491/2007) and M/s Siddharth Clutches Pvt. Ltd. (CA No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2009

In the Matter Of: Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. Represented by Its ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Mar-18-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Appellant(s): Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Advocates. Counsel for the Respondent(s): Mr. S. Balaji and Mr. B. N. Prakash, Mr. Anand K. Ganesan and Mr. M. G. Ramachandran for KPTCL.

Mr. Pratap Venugopal, appearing for the appellant, submits that the principal ground raised in the appeal is denial of principles of natural justice in as much as the appellant was not afforded opportunity of being heard...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 1995

Andhra Bank and anr. Vs. Station House Officer, Pattabhipuram Crime Po ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-08-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 167, 205, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 477A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195, 195(1), 463, 465, 468, 471, 475 and 476

Reported in : 1998(2)ALT587; 1995(2)ALT(Cri)587; 1996CriLJ277

Advocate for Appellant : C. Praveen Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. The question involved in this writ petition is the applicability of S. 195(b)(ii) of the Criminal Procedure Code to an offence alleged to have been committed in respect of a document prior to the institution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2001

Bankatlal Satyanarayana Parikh and Co., Nizamabad Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-20-2001

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14(4) and 20(4); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 263; Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 35(1); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 33-B

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD147; 2001(2)ALT151; [2001]122STC236(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Chandra Sekhar, Adv.

ORDERG. RAGHURAM, J.1. These five appeals involve common questions of law and fact and thus heard and disposed of by this common judgment.Brief overview of fads leading to the lis:(1) The appellant (assessee) is a dealer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1998

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. J.K.S. Manickam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-16-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]244ITR596(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : C. V. Rajan, for the Commissioner S. Balaji for M/s. K. Ramagopal and P. Subha Rao, for the assessee

N. V. Balasubramanian J.At the instance of the revenue , the Appellate Tribunal has stated the case and referred the following substantial question of law for our consideration in relation to the assessment year 1980-81 :'Whether,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2026

Tamil nadu Private Professional colleges Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-16-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 16-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA Tamil Nadu Private Professional Colleges Association Health Sciences (TNPPCA - HS) Represented by its Secretary, J.Jayaseelan, “Prasanna Enclave”, 1st Floor, No.30, Bharathi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2003

AldowIn Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-28-2003

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2002)LC420Tri(Delhi)

1. In these 4 appeals, arising out of a common Order-in-Original No.27/2001 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise, the issue involved is whether the panels of Aluminium Glass Curtain Wall emerge on account of manufacturing activity,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial