Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s b vakil · Page 1 of about 204 results (0.107 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 26 1990

C.B. Pardhanani and Others Vs. M.B. Pardhanani

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-26-1990

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398 and (1), 399, 400, 402, 406, 433, 538, 539, 540, 541, 542, 543 and 544

Reported in : [1993]78CompCas540(Kar); ILR1990KAR2604; 1990(2)KarLJ298

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Naganand, Adv.

K. Shivashankar Bhat, J.1. This petition which purports to be under section 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act', for short), seeks the following reliefs against the respondent :'(1) to declare that the respondent is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1999

Naginbhai Chhotubhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-13-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2000)GLR635

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Vakil, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner who was appointed as a Notified Inspector of Factories, has challenged the order dated 17.11.1984 (Annexure-G), passed by the State Government terminating...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1962

Kesharibhai Jesingbhai Vs. Bai Lilavati and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-07-1962

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5 and 14

Reported in : AIR1963Guj119; (1963)GLR59

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Vakil, Adv.

ORDERP.N. Bhagwati, J.1. This application to condone delay in filing the appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act arises from a suit filed by the appellant against the respondents in the Court of the Third...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 21 2008

Gopinathji Dev Mandir Trust Thro. Chairman and anr. Vs. State of Gujar ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-21-2008

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Sections 65, 65(2), 146, 146(1), 148, 258 and 264; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Gram Panchayats Act; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 79; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 28, 227 and 298

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2215

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Vakil, learned Sr. Adv. and Chirag B. Patel, Adv.;

Abhilasha Kumari, J.1. Rule. Ms. Sangeeta Vishen, learned Assistant Government Pleader, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents Nos. 1 and 2, Mr. Harin P. Raval, learned advocate, waives service of notice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2004

Dashrathbhai Bholidas Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-23-2004

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120-B, 167, 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Banking Regulation Act - Sections 46

Reported in : II(2005)BC406; 2004CriLJ4369; (2004)3GLR1921

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Vakil, Adv. FOR; Yogesh S. Lakhani and; R.K. Mishra

R.P. Dholakia, J, 1. Rule. Mr.A.D.Oza, learned Public Prosecutor with r.R.J.Dave, learned counsel for the complainant and r.K.G.Vakharia, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.Tushar ehta, waive service of notice of rule on behalf of the espondent Nos.1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2004

Ajendraprasadji Narendraprasadji Pande Vs. Swami Keshavprakashdasji Na ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-06-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 18-22, 50, 51, 79, 80; Arbitration and Conciliation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rule 3 - Order 23, Rules 1 and 2; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act,1956 - Sections 9(1)(5); Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : (2004)3GLR2081

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Vakil, Sr. Counsel and; A.S. Vakil, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1-2

C.K. Buch, J.1. This Appeal from Order under O. 43 R. 1(r) of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC for short) is preferred by the appellants- original defendants against the order dated 1.10.2002 (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2009

Sardarji Maganji Waghela Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-12-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism (Repeal) Act, 2004 - Sections 2(3), 3, 3(1), 3(3), 32 and 60(4); Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164, 190, 226, 227, 228, 239, 240 and 321; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Civil Law; Criminal Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 141

Reported in : (2009)2GLR1399

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Vakil, Sr. Counsel,;Vijay H. Patel of;H.L. Patel, Advs.

Bhagwati Prasad, J.1. In the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the opinion of the Review Committee (hereinafter referred to as 'the Committee' formed under the Prevention of Terrorism (Repeal) Act, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2004

Chembond Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Indian Oil Corporation

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-11-2004

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Official Secrets Act, 1923 - 3(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1241

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Vakil and; Asim Pandya, Advs.

K.A.Puj.1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing and setting aside of the impugned decision dated 06.01.2004 of the respondent Corporation i.e. Indian Oil Corporation Limited,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2003

Ramanbhai B. Patel and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-04-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3, 3(35) and 8; Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 - Sections 2(21) and 6(2)

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1522

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Vakil, Adv.

J.M. Panchal, J.1. By filing instant appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, the five appellants claim that the order and judgment dated December 30, 1999 passed by the learned single Judge in Special Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2003

Shreerang Developers and ors. Vs. Himmatlal Jamnadas Maniar and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : (2003)3GLR2448

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Vakil and; A.S. Vakil, Adv. for Appellant Nos. 1 to 13 Appeal From Order Nos. 112, 113 and 114 o

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. Since, common points are involved in all these appeals, with the consent of parties, all these appeals are taken up for hearing together. So far as A.O. Nos. 190, 191, 282, 283 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial