Advanced Search Results

Sheikh Abdul Rashid and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rules 24 and 382 to 399; Jammu and Kashmir Police (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1984 - Rules 5, 14 and 20; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR591]; 2008(1)JKJ3[SC]; JT2008(1)SC127

Advocate for Appellant : Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr. Adv.,; S.R. Singh,; Bimal Roy J

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Vexed question of inter se seniority between the appellants and the private respondents herein is in question in this appeal which arises out of a Judgment and Order dated 27.07.2005 passed...

State of Uttaranchal and anr. Vs. Madan Mohan Joshi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Regularisation of Ad hoc Employees on the posts within the jurisdiction of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Rules, 1979 - Rules 3, 4(3), 5, 17(2), 20 and 25; Uttaranchal Higher Education (Group A) Service Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 309

Reported in : 2008(8)SCALE491; (2008)6SCC797; 2008AIRSCW4029

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanium, A.S.G.,; Rachana Srivastava and; Ashish J

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Inter se seniority amongst the teachers of Kumaon University is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 21.3.2006 passed by a Division Bench of...

Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Secretary/Commr. Transport Department and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Establishment and Administration Rules - Rule 10.2

Reported in : JT2007(12)SC428; (2008)2MLJ551(SC); 2007(12)SCALE241; (2008)1SCC400; 2007AIRSCW6659

Advocate for Appellant : Naginder Rai, Sr. Adv.,; Naresh Kaushik,; Lalita Kaushik

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave Granted.2. Inter se seniority amongst the deputationists is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 13.9.2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court...

Tejinder Singh Gujral Vs. Inderjit Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC401(SC); [2007(1)JCR58(SC)]; (2007)2MLJ287(SC); RLW2007(1)SC650; 2006(10)SCALE448; (2007)1SCC508; 2006(3)ShimLC314

Advocate for Appellant : Manmohan, Sr. Adv.,; T.S. Gujral,; Jasbir Singh Malik an

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant herein is a practicing lawyer. While riding on a scooter, he met with an accident as a tempo which was allegedly being driven rashly and negligently by Respondent No. 1...

P.S. Gopinathan Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Kerala State Higher Judicial Service Rules; Kerala Judicial Service Rules, 1991; Kerala Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1961 - Rules 1, 2, 5(2) and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 233 and 233(1)

Reported in : 2008(7)SCALE564; (2008)7SCC70; 2008(3)SLJ268(SC); 2008AIRSCW4602; AIR2008SC2768; 2008(4)Supreme85

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv.,; Jayanth Muthraj and; K.V. Mohan

P.P. Naolekar, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant was directly recruited to the post of Munsiff and was later promoted to the post of Subordinate Judge. Thereafter, the appellant was promoted to the Kerala State Higher Judicial...

Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow, U.P. Vs. Chhata Sugar Co. Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 8(1) 8(2), 8(4), 8(5), 10 and 22; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 4, 4,(1), 4(4) and 35L; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 173 and 174G; Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3 and 3(2); Constitution of India - Article 366 and 366(28); Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantaran Niyamawali, Rules 1974 - Rules 2 and 23; Uttar Pradesh Act - Sections 10(1); Municipal Act - Sections 443 and 548;

Reported in : 2004(92)ECC457; 2004(165)ELT369(SC); JT2004(3)SC167; (2004)3SCC466

Advocate for Appellant : Soli J. Sorabjee, Attorney General,; Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv.,;

S.H. Kapadia, J. 1. Doubting the correctness of a two-Judge Bench decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut v. Kisan Sahkari Chinni Mills Ltd. reported in : [2002]255ITR57(SC) , a...

Nair Service Society Vs. Dist. Officer, Kerala Public Service Commissi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1958 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 12, 13 and 15 to 17; Constitution of India - Articles 16(1), 16(4), 16(4B), 309 and 335; Kerala State and Subordinate Service (Amendment) Rules, 1959 - Rules 14 to 17

Reported in : JT2003(9)SC408; 2003(3)KLT1126(SC); 2003(9)SCALE608; (2003)12SCC10

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv.,; K.V. Mohan and; V. Balachandran,

Ar. Lakshmanan, J.1. The appellant before us is a Society called Nair Service Society ('NSS' in short) filed the above appeals through its Secretary against the common judgment and order dated 05.08.1997 passed by the Kerala...

The Director General, I.C.M.R. Vs. D.K. JaIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : ICMR Rules; Punjab Police Rules - Rule 16.5; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR367]; (2007)IILLJ721SC; 2007(5)SCALE82; 2008(1)SLJ226(SC); 2007AIRSCW2408

Advocate for Appellant : Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv.,; Y.K. Rao,; Madhu Sikri and;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Learned Counsel for both the parties accept that the Union of India is not a necessary party in this case. It is hence directed to be expunged accordingly. Leave granted.2. Respondent No. 1...

A.P.S.R.T.C. and ors. Vs. B. Bodan Reddy (Dead) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR1043]; 2007(2)SCALE403; 2007AIRSCW1085; 2007LawHerald(SC)607

Advocate for Appellant : R. Santhan Krishnan,; K. Radha Rani,; Praveen K. Pandey,

S.B. Sinha, J.1. The Respondents herein were appointed, by the appellant-Corporation as Security Guards. Different regions have been created by the Corporation for managing its affairs. The divisions of Karimnagar, Nizamabad, Warangal and Khammam formed part...

Purnendu Mukhopadhyay and ors. Vs. V.K. Kapoor and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Rule 11

Reported in : (2008)1CALLT22(SC); JT2007(12)SC439; 2008(2)SLJ12(SC); 2008AIRSCW481

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar Jain,; Puneet Jain,; H.D. Thanvi,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. This case has a chequered history. Appellants herein were appointed as Chargeman Grade-II. They were, in terms of the Scheme dated 23rd April, 1965, required to appear in an examination for...