Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Jagannath Atmaram Patil

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 392, 397 and 411

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR218

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Patil, Public Prosecutor

M.F. Saldanha, J. 1. The facts of this case are both gory and gruesome. A six year old girl belonging to village Dhavde appears to have been given in marriage by her parents in a typical...

M.M. Barve, New Panvel Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Appellant Mr. M.M. Barve In Person. Mr. S.B. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent.

Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member This appeal is directed against the order dated 19/07/2007 passed in consumer complaint No.35/2007 M.M. Barve V/s. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. decided by District Consumer Forum...

Eknathbuwa Gyanoba Bharati and ors. Vs. Sheshabai Laxman Buwa (Abated) ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 54 - Order 41, Rule 31

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR762; 2008(6)BomCR263

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Patil, Adv., h/f., ;A.B. Kale, Adv.

Borkar P.R., J.1. This is an appeal preferred by original defendant No. 6 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ahmedpur in Regular Civil Suit No. 217 of 1974...

Punjab University, Chandigarh and Another Vs. Deepika Mohan

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Subject : MRTP

K.C. Gupta, President: 1. This appeal has been directed by opposite parties against order dated 8.8.2007 passed by Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T. Chandigarh (hereinafter to be referred as District Consumer Forum), vide which the complaint...

Omprakash Shankarlal Sharma Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR599; 1993CriLJ3175

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Nakhwa, Adv.

1. Issues of some consequence concerning the conduct of a serious trial have been raised in this proceeding and, having regard to the vehemence with which they were contested and the seriousness of the errors that...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Dr. Mahesh P. Mehta

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Customs Act - Sections 8, 8(1), 50, 52, 54, 71, 71(1), 71(3) and 135(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 8(1); Gold Control Act; Customs Act

Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR606

1. The marriage is no doubt a happy event in one's life and so it was with the first respondent herein, who is a Medical Practitioner and who has settled down in United States holding a...

Chandrakant Chandulal Bhansali Vs. Shrikant Shrikrishna Joshi and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438 and 482

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR658; (1992)94BOMLR689

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Mohite, Adv.

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. Is an order granting anticipatory bail to be equated with a regular bail order passed by a Criminal Court and, consequently, would the principles applicable to the cancellation of bail apply equally to...

Shri.Mukund S/O.Balakrishna Vijapure vs Shri.Ramesh S/O.Balakrishna Vi ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : MRTP

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 145809 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:1. SHRI. MUKUND S/O.BALAKRISHNA...

Ratansi Hirji JaIn Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 7, 16(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule A-25.02

Reported in : 1982(2)BomCR590

ORDER1. The petitioner, hereinafter referred to as 'the accused', was prosecuted in Criminal Case No. 169 of 1978 in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kulaba at Alibag for an offence punishable under S....

Pandian Kanappan Nadar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR295; 1993CriLJ3883

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. V.V. Thorat, Adv.

Saldanha, J.1. The much-maligned Bombay Police Force deserves a compliment and a pat on the back for some excellent detection and investigation in this very unfortunate case wherein an elderly gentleman was fatally stabbed for some...