Advanced Search Results
Vikram Organics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Anirox Pigments Ltd.
Kolkata
Feb-18-1997
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 394, 394(1) and 394A; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959
[1997]88CompCas804(Cal)
S.B. Mukherjee, Senior Adv. as Amicus curiae
Altamas Kabir, J.1. This judge's summons has been taken out by Anirox Pigments Limited, hereinafter referred to as 'the transferee company', for dissolution without winding up of the transferor company, namely, Vikram Organics Private Limited, pursuant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHungerford Investment Trust Ltd. Vs. Haridas Mundhra and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-14-1970
ContractCivil
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 28 and 28(1); ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Section 35; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 100 and 101; ;Constitution of India - Article 133
AIR1971Cal182,75CWN517
S.B. Mukherjee, Adv.
B.C. Mitra, J. 1. This is an offshoot of a spate of litigations arising out of an agreement for the sale of the controlling block of shares of a private company, Turner Morrison and Co. Private...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSm. Sangita Moitra Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Kolkata
Nov-13-2000
Service
West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973 - Section 106;; Recruitment and Leave of Teachers in Primary Schools Rules, 1991 - Rules 8 and 9
(2001)2CALLT173(HC)
Mr. P.K. Ghosh, Adv.; Mr. S.B. Mukherjee and ;Mr. B.B. Biswas, Advs.
M.H.S. Ansari. J.1. The case of the petitioner in brief is that she was appointed as primary teacher in Ahiritola Banga Bidyalaya for Girls (Primary section) on 1.1.93 and has been functioning as such continuously since...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Arrah Sasaram Light Railway Company Ltd. (In Voluntary Liquidation) an ...
Kolkata
Apr-20-1979
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446(3) and 518(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 144
[1982]52CompCas326(Cal)
S.B. Mukherjee and ;Sibaji Sen, Advs.
Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Section 446 read with Section 518(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, for a transfer of the Title Suit No. 564 of 1978 (District Board, Rohtas v....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhubaneshwar Singh and anr. Vs. Kanthal India Ltd. and ors.
Kolkata
Oct-12-1982
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 43A, 397 and 398; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. 1973 - Section 29
[1986]59CompCas46(Cal)
S.B. Mukherjee, Adv.
Basu, J.1. This is an application under Sections 397 and 398 read with Sections 402, 403 and 406 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The facts relating to the making of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKumarapuram Gopal Krishnan Ananthakrishnan Vs. Burdwan-cutwa Railway C ...
Kolkata
Apr-04-1978
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 149(2A) and 433; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137
[1978]48CompCas611(Cal),82CWN774
S.B. Mukherjee and ;T.K. Basu, Advs.
Salil Kumar Dutta, J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment and order of Ramendra Mohan Datta J., dated March 21, 1975 (see page 211 supra) whereby the application of the Registrar of Companies for winding...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeimens India Ltd. Vs. Phanindra Kumar Dutt
Kolkata
Jun-27-1974
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 34
AIR1975Cal271
S.B. Mukherjee, ;Jayanta Mitter and ;D.K. Shome, Advs.
ORDERHazra, J.1. This is an application for stay of a suit under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The matter arises in thisway :2. On or about March 7, 1974, one Phanindra Kumar Dutt filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPawan JaIn and ors. Vs. Hindusthan Club Limited and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-29-2005
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 227, 274, 274(1) and 274(3); ;Companies Rules, 2003 - Rules 2, 3, 5 and 9; ;Election Rules
(2005)5CompLJ1(Cal),[2005]62SCL610(Cal)
Bhaskar Sen, ;Desal Banerjee, ;P.C. Sen, ;S.B. Mukherjee, Sr. Advs.
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. This motion has been taken out for interlocutory relief of order of prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and each of them and/or by their servants and agents or assigns or otherwise from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNathmal Lal Chand Vs. Bharat Jute Mills Ltd. and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-17-1980
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(1), 391(2) and 392; West Bengal Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and 304
[1983]53CompCas392(Cal)
S.B. Mukherjee, Adv.
Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Section 392(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, for further modification of the first scheme of compromise as sanctioned by the order dated 8th December, 1958, and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBenaras Electric Light and Power Co. Ltd. Vs. U.P. State Electricity B ...
Kolkata
Jul-10-1980
CompanyElectricity
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 468, 518 and 529; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 7A; ;Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Amendment and Validation) Acts, 1974 and 1975 - Sections 6, 6, 7 and 7A
[1983]53CompCas597(Cal)
S.B. Mukherjee and ;M.B. Mukherjee, Advs.
Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J. 1. This is an application by the petitioner, Benaras Electric Light & Power Co. Ltd., hereinafter referred to as ' the company (in liquidation)', under Sections 468 and 518(1)(b) and (4)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »