Advanced Search Results

Mohan Mulji Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Rajpila, District Br ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18 and 53; Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 40 and 46; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 1; Civil Procedurre Code, 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1967Guj154; (1966)GLR879

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Majumdar, Adv.

Bhagwati, J.(1) This group of appeals raises a short question in regard to payment of court-fee on an application for a reference made to the Collector under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The facts...

ishwarbhai Desaibhai Patel Vs. Vadilal Lallubhai Mehta and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Election

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rules 17 and 18 - Order 20, Rules 1 and 3 - Order 23, Rule 1; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 86(5), 87 and 100; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 30; Bombay High Court Rules (0n the Original Side) - Rules 282 and 283

Reported in : AIR1968Guj289

Advocate for Appellant : N.V. Oza,; S.K. Zaveri and; S.B. Majumdar, Advs.

ORDER1. The respondents Nos. 1 and 2 contested the last General Election held on 15-2-67 for the Daserei Legislative Assembly Constituency No. 68 of the Gujarat State wherein the respondent No. 1 was declared duly elected...

Purushottam Das Bangur and ors. Vs. B. Majumdar Samajpati and Sons Hot ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR2008SC2715; (SCSuppl)2008(3)CHN138; JT2008(4)SC351; 2008(4)SCALE136; (2008)7SCC447; 2008AIRSCW4528; 2008(4)KCCRSN316

ORDER1. This special leave petition is filed against the order dated 24th of April, 2007 passed by the High Court at Calcutta in APOT No. 44 of 2007 whereby the High Court had dismissed the appeal...

M.L. Dalmiya and Co. Ltd. Vs. International Airport Authority of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : JT2000(8)SC538

ORDERS.B. Majumdar, J.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties finally by their consent.3. The short question involved in this appeal is about the pendente lite interest. The appellant contends that he was...

State of Gujarat Vs. Pagi Bhurabhai Rumalbhai

Court : Gujarat

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311 and 311(2); Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850

Reported in : AIR1969Guj260

Advocate for Appellant : G.M. Vidyarthi, Asst. Govt. Pleader

N.K. Vakil, J. 1. The only point involved in this second appeal is whether reasonable opportunity to be given to a Government Servant under Article 311(2) of the Constitution in a Departmental Inquiry includes a right...

Lalji Purshottam Vs. Thacker Madhavji Meghaji

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 60 and 76; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 11 and 12

Reported in : AIR1976Guj161; (1976)GLR497

Advocate for Appellant : B.J. She­lat and; D.D. Vyas, Advs.; S.B. Majmudar,;

Divan, C.J.1. In Letters Patent Appeal No. 52 of 1972, a Division Bench consisting of myself and P. D. Desai, J., has on July 5, 1973, referred the following three questions to a larger Bench and...

Dr. Rajesh Nath Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR1996All336; (1996)2UPLBEC1313

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj Srivastava and ;Smt. Archana Srivastava, Advs.

ORDER1. The petitioner has completed his M.B.B.S. Course from Motilal Nehru Medical College, Allahabad securing 56.5 percent marks and in the year 1989 completed his internship from S.R.N. Medical College and became eligible for Post Graduate...

Mirza Wajahad Baig and ors. Vs. Sharanappa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : JT2000(8)SC112; 2000(II)OLR(SC)293

ORDERS.B. Majumdar, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellants as well as learned Counsel for the sole contesting respondent being respondent No.1. respondent nos. 2 and 3 are formal parties,...

Miheer H. Mafatlal Vs. Mafatlal Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391, 392, 393, 394-A, 433 and 643; Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 153

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)260; AIR1997SC506; [1996]87CompCas792(SC); JT1996(8)SC205; 1996(6)SCALE595; (1997)1SCC579; [1996]Supp6SCR1

Advocate for Appellant : Shanti Bhusan,; Miheer Thakur,; Darshan Parekhm,;

ORDERS.B. Majumdar, J.1. Leave granted.2. By consent of learned advocate of parties this appeal was taken up for final hearing. We have heard the learned advocates of parties. The appeal is being disposed of by this...

Mansukhlal Vs. M.V. Shah, Official Liquidator, Liquidator of Hathising ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(1), 391(2), 392, 392(1), 392(1), 392(1), 393 and 393(1)

Reported in : [1976]46CompCas279(Guj); (1976)GLR592

Advocate for Appellant : B.R. Shah, Adv.

D.A. Desai, J.1. This summons is a sequel to a very unfortunate tragedy of an unprecedented character that occurred in the process of reviving, rejuvenating and resuscitating a sick production unit in this city. Hathising ....