Advanced Search Results
Mukul Dalal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-04-1988
Criminal
Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984 - Rule 22; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 114, 120B, 337, 354, 409, 498A, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 24, 24(1), 24(8), 25, 25(1), 199(2), 225, 301(1), 301(2), 302, 308, 321, 377 and 378
(1988)90BOMLR208; JT1988(2)SC280; 1988(1)SCALE909; (1988)3SCC144; [1988]3SCR868
S.B. Bhasme,; M.C. Bhandare,; Dilip Pillai,;
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 305,306 & 307 of 1988.From the Judgment and Order dated 2nd/3rd July, 1986 of the High Court of Bombay in Criminal application No. 1127, 527 and 866 of 1985.S.B. Bhasme,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHukumchand Amolikchand Logde Vs. Madhava Balaji Potdar and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-31-1983
Civil
AIR1983SC540; 1983(1)SCALE707; 1984(Supp)SCC600
ORDER 1. Petition for special leave to appeal against the decision of the High Court was granted. Ex-parte ad interim stay of execution was granted subject to notice of motion being taken. The matter is listed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandurang Ramchandra Mandlik (Since Deceased) by His Lrs. and anr. Vs. ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-12-1989
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 26
AIR1989SC2240; JT1989(3)SC647; 1989(2)SCALE572; 1989Supp(2)SCC627; [1989]2SCR1; [1989]Supp2SCR1
K.N. Saikia, J.1. This plaintiffs' appeal by special leave is from the judgment of the High Court of Bombay in Second Appeal No. 983 of 1966 setting aside the judgment of the courts below and remanding...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prakash Warehousing Co. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay an ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-13-1991
Tenancy
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 105A, 105B, 105B(1), 105F and 105G; Constitution of India - Article 227
JT1991(1)SC631; 1991(1)SCALE416; (1991)2SCC304; [1991]1SCR829; 1991(1)LC553(SC)
V.M. Tarkunde,; S. Janani and; Urmila Kapoor, Advs
T. Kochu Thommen, J. 1. This appeal arises from the judgment of the Bombay High Court in Special Civil Application No. 983 of 1972 setting aside the order made by the appellate officer, (the Principal Judge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanganath Kondaji Vs. Kisan and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-07-1955
Civil
Debt Law; Dekkhan Agriculturists Relief Act, 1879 - Sections 10, 10A and 53; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 34, Rule 1
AIR1956Bom234
S.B. Bhasme, Adv.
1. This is a revisional application in which Mr. Bhasme for the petitioner has attempted to challenge the finding recorded by the learned District Judge that the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Ganesh Dastane Vs. Sucheta Narayan Dastane
Mumbai
Feb-24-1969
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10, 10(1), 12(1), 12(2), 13(1), 23, 25 and 26; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4, 31, 45 and 87
AIR1970Bom312; (1969)71BOMLR569; ILR1969Bom1024; 1969MhLJ798
S.B. Bhasme, Adv.
1. This second appeal raises novel and difficult points with regard to the relations between a modern educated husband and his wife in Hindu Society.2. The appellant in this appeal is the husband Dr. Narayan Ganesh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Iris Chandrabala Premnath
Mumbai
Aug-24-1954
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 211(2), 342, 362, 362(1), 362(4), 423, 435 and 439; Bombay Prevention of Prostitution Act, 1923 - Sections 3
AIR1955Bom45; (1954)56BOMLR1113; 1955CriLJ125; ILR1955Bom171
Party in person, ;S.B. Bhasme, Adv. appears as amicus curiae and ;H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader
Dixit, J. 1. This revisional application has been referred to a division bench by Mr. Justice Gajendragadkar in consequence, we are informed, of Mr. Justice Shah's decision which has been reported in -- 'Naran Velji v....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiva Martand Tapkire and anr. Vs. Arun Nankchand Khatri and anr.
Mumbai
Jan-16-1968
Property
Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 178, 179 and 181; Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 - Sections 31; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6 and 7
AIR1969Bom93; (1968)70BOMLR442; 1968MhLJ883
S.B. Bhasme, Adv.
Tarkunde, J.1. The petitioners claim to be the owners of a land, Gat No. 129, admeasuring 28 acres situate at village Jalochi near Baramati in the Poona District. In execution of an award which had been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohamad Haidar Mujawar Vs. Jamal Haidar Mujawar and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-23-1968
Trusts and Societies
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 70-A; Bombay Public Trusts (Amendment) Act, 1954
AIR1969Bom328; (1969)71BOMLR38
S.B. Bhasme, Adv.
Patel, J.1. First Appeal No. 56 of 1967 arises out of an order made by the learned District Judge at Kolhapur setting aside the order made by the Joint Charity Commissioner in a revisional application. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. A.H. Khan
Mumbai
Mar-08-1965
Labour and IndustrialCriminal
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 10 and 101
AIR1966Bom107; (1965)67BOMLR566; 1966CriLJ397; ILR1966Bom66
S.B. Bhasme, Asst. Govt. Pleader
ORDER(1) These two reference are made by the District Judge, Sholapur, under S. 438 of the Criminal procedure code recommending that the conviction and sentences recorded In the both the cases should be set aside. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »