Advanced Search Results

Deora Wire and Wires and anr. Vs. General Manager, Dic and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 12

Reported in : [2001]123STC360(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Abhyankar, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The question that falls for consideration in this writ filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution by the petitioner is, whether the petitioner is entitled to claim extension in the period...

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mandar Madhav Tambe and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 96(2)

Reported in : 1986(2)BomCR115; [1989]65CompCas251(Bom); 1986MhLJ274

Masodkar J.1. This appeal is filed by original opponent No. 3, that is to say, the New India Assurance Co. Ltd., which arises out of the compensation proceedings initiated under section 110A of the Motor Vehicles...

Purushottam Vs. Narayan

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Abhyankar

1. With the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is finally heard. 2. The appellant has filed the present appeal challenging two orders both of the date 23rd February, 2016 passed by...

Sitabai and ors. Vs. Ishak HussaIn and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2001)ACC761; 2002ACJ1029

Advocate for Appellant : S. Abhyankar, Adv.

Shambhoo Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed by the claimants against the award dated 11.10.1996 passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Rajgarh (Biaora) in Claim Case No. 8 of 1989 whereby compensation of Rs. 15,000 was...

Ramappa Vanappa Akale and ors. Vs. Laxman Malyappa Akale

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1951Bom258; (1950)52BOMLR839

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Abhyankar, Adv.

Gajendragadkar, J. 1. This is a second appeal which has come to this Court from Kolhapur and it has been placed before a Pull Bench because the learned Chief Justice of the Kolhapur High Court had...

Narayansingh and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 304II, 307, 323 and 324

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT175

Advocate for Appellant : S. Abhyankar and ;Siddiqui, Advs.

ORDERShambhoo Singh, J.1. This judgment shall govern the disposal of Cr. A. No. 623/94 and Cr. A. No. 78/95.2. Accused persons Narayansingh & Badrilal have filed Cr. A. No. 623/94 against the judgment & order dated...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. B.G. Chitale

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)11STJ63CESTAT(Mum.)bai

1. This appeal is directed against order-in-appeal dt. 17.7.2006. Vide which the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the order-in-original which rejected the refund claim filed by the respondents.2. Considered the submissions made in detail by both...

Bhaskaracharya Pratishthana Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1995)52ITD28(Pune.)

1. These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the consolidated order of the learned CIT (Appeals) dated 16-1-1992 in relation to the assessment years 1986-87 and 1987-88. (1) The learned CIT (Appeals) erred in...

Union of India Vs. M/S. Ajit Mehta and Associates, Pune and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 8, 10, 16, 17, 20, 30, 31, 33, 35, 41 and 43; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Articles 119 and 158; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1990Bom45; 1989(3)BomCR535

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Agarwal, Adv.

ORDERSawant, J.1. These five appeals arise out of the decision of the trial Court by which the trial Court has disposed of five suits and five objection petitions.Respondent No. 1 in all the appeals is a...

Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Kalidas Devram Patil

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11-A

Reported in : 2000(1)ALLMR413; 2000(2)BomCR630; [2000(84)FLR157]; 1999(3)MhLj857

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Ghuge, Adv.

ORDERB.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Heard Shri Ghuge, learned Counsel for the petitioner Company and Shri S.S. Pawar, learned Counsel for the respondent employee. Rule. Taken up for final hearing forthwith, by consent.2. The respondent employee came to...