Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s a shah · Page 1 of about 1,709 results (0.617 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 10 2001

Rituraj Talkies Vs. Mamlatdar-cum-prescribed Officer, Dhranghadra and ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-10-2001

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Gujarat Entertainment Tax Act, 1977 - Sections 3 and 6

Reported in : AIR2002Guj94; (2001)4GLR3121

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Shah, Adv.

ORDERM.S. Shah, J. 1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner running a Cinema in Dhangadhra Town of Surendranagar District has challenged the order dated 2-12-1995 (Annexure-F) passed by the Commissioner of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2008

Hirabai Baburao Shidankar and Vitthal Baburao Shidankar Vs. Rayat Shik ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-19-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4B, 8, 9, 9A, 9B, 9C, 10, 10A, 11, 13, 27, 31 to 31D, 32 to 32-R, 33A, 33B, 33C, 85, 85A, 88, 88B, 88B(1), 88B(2) and 88C; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1960; Mamlatdars Courts Act, 1906; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR350; (2008)110BOMLR3422

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Sr. Counsel holding for ;S.P. Shah and ;D.B. Rode, Advs.

R.M. Borde, J.1. Heard Shri P.M. Shah, learned Senior Counsel holding for S/Shri S.P. Shah and D.B. Rode, advocates for petitioners, Shri R.N. Dhorde, learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 & 2 and Mrs. B.R. Khekale,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2026

Vinay Kumar@Varun Bidhuri@Binnu vs State (Govt. Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-05-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shakir Shabir, Mr. Vikrant Singh, Mr. Sazid S.R. Shah, Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 05.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 5025/2025, CRL.M.A. 38678/2025 & CRL.M.A. VINAY KUMAR@VARUN BIDHURI@BINNU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shakir Shabir, Mr. Vikrant Singh and Mr. Sazid...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 01 1992

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-1992

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR416; 1993LC654(Bombay)

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Shah, ; V.G. Rege ; and ; K.C. Sidhwa, Advs.

Sujata Manohar, J.1. The appellants are the original respondents. They are hereinafter referred to as the respondents. The respondents to the appeal are the original petitioners. They are hereinafter referred to as the petitioners.2. The petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2004

Pramod Kumar Gupta Vs. Ist Addl. D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-12-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2648

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Shah, Adv.

ORDERAnjani Kumar, J.1. Heard Sri S. A. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioner.2. These two connected writ petitions, raise the common questions of fact and law, therefore, they are decided by a common judgment.3. Learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1991

Dr. Mrs. Banoo J. Coyajee and Others., Pratap Govind Pawar and Others. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-02-1991

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81, 108, 172 and 286

Reported in : [1995]84CompCas534(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. J. Shah, Mr. S. M. Shah

Mrs. Sujata Manohar, J.1. This group of six appeals is filed against an order and judgment of a learned single judge dated January 13, 1988, in Company Petition No. 476 of 1986, as also against an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1994

Ved Prakash Vs. Chaman Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-07-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 441; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 425, 427, 441 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3890

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Shah, Adv.

G.S.N. Tripathi, J.1. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar, vide his judgment and order dated 31-5-1978, acquitted the accused Chaman Singh, Sahab Singh, Bhup Singh and Vishnu Datt on the charges under Section 448, 427, IPC. Therefore,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2000

Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Narsabai ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-14-2000

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(8), 51A, 51C and 77

Reported in : 2001ACJ1989; [2002(92)FLR428]; (2001)1GLR284

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Shah, Adv.

D.C. Srivastava, J.1. This is opponent's Appeal against the Judgment and order dated 6-3-1979 of Employees Insurance Court, Ahmedabad, granting declaration that the death of deceased Naran Pantaji was the result of the employment injury and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1986

Sharadchandra Chimanlal and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-14-1986

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Rules 1 and 2; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18, 23, 24 and 25; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 23(2)

Reported in : AIR1987Guj55; (1986)2GLR1369

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Shah, Adv.

B.K. Mehta, J.1. A few facts need be noticed in order to appreciate the claim made in this appeal.2. By notification issued by the State Government in the Revenue Department dt. Jan. 10, 1974 under S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 1987

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Maj. Virendrarai J. Kharod

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-15-1987

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1987)2GLR1020

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.R. Shah

R.C. Mankad, J.1. In this appeal directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge, mainly two questions arise for our consideration: (i) Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the respondent's...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial