Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s a shah · Page 1 of about 1,070 results (0.185 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 10 2001

Rituraj Talkies Vs. Mamlatdar-cum-prescribed Officer, Dhranghadra and ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-10-2001

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Gujarat Entertainment Tax Act, 1977 - Sections 3 and 6

Reported in : AIR2002Guj94; (2001)4GLR3121

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Shah, Adv.

ORDERM.S. Shah, J. 1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner running a Cinema in Dhangadhra Town of Surendranagar District has challenged the order dated 2-12-1995 (Annexure-F) passed by the Commissioner of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2008

Hirabai Baburao Shidankar and Vitthal Baburao Shidankar Vs. Rayat Shik ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-19-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4B, 8, 9, 9A, 9B, 9C, 10, 10A, 11, 13, 27, 31 to 31D, 32 to 32-R, 33A, 33B, 33C, 85, 85A, 88, 88B, 88B(1), 88B(2) and 88C; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1960; Mamlatdars Courts Act, 1906; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR350; (2008)110BOMLR3422

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Sr. Counsel holding for ;S.P. Shah and ;D.B. Rode, Advs.

R.M. Borde, J.1. Heard Shri P.M. Shah, learned Senior Counsel holding for S/Shri S.P. Shah and D.B. Rode, advocates for petitioners, Shri R.N. Dhorde, learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 & 2 and Mrs. B.R. Khekale,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2004

Pramod Kumar Gupta Vs. Ist Addl. D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-12-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2648

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Shah, Adv.

ORDERAnjani Kumar, J.1. Heard Sri S. A. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioner.2. These two connected writ petitions, raise the common questions of fact and law, therefore, they are decided by a common judgment.3. Learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 14 1986

Sharadchandra Chimanlal and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-14-1986

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Rules 1 and 2; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18, 23, 24 and 25; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 23(2)

Reported in : AIR1987Guj55; (1986)2GLR1369

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Shah, Adv.

B.K. Mehta, J.1. A few facts need be noticed in order to appreciate the claim made in this appeal.2. By notification issued by the State Government in the Revenue Department dt. Jan. 10, 1974 under S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1994

Ganpati Salt Works and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-21-1994

Subject : CommercialProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 14, 15, 29, 32, 37, 38 and 48; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1); Cinematograph Act - Sections 6F; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Schedule - Article 12

Reported in : AIR1995Guj61; (1994)2GLR1697

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Shah, Adv.

ORDERD.G. Karia, J.1. Both these petitions involve common questions of fact and law and as such both the petitions are being disposed of by the common judgment, with the consent and agreement of the learned Advocate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 1994

Shrirang Touring Talkies and Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-29-1994

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Gujarat Entertainments Tax Act, 1977 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1A), 6, 6(2), 6(6), 9 and 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 1; Bombay Cinerma Regulations Act, 1954; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1995Guj123; (1995)1GLR171

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Shah, Adv.

S. Chatterji, J. 1. By order dated 18th November, 1986 passed by this Court (Coram: P. A. Gokulakrishnan, C. J. and C. T. Nanavati, J.) Rule was issued in both the aforesaid matters on 18-11-1986. However,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2002

Ashokkumar J. Pandya Vs. Suyog Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and o ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-21-2002

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19; Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 37; Gujarat Co-operative Societies Rules, 1965 - Rule 3

Reported in : (2002)3GLR673

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Shah, Adv. for K.V. Shelat, Adv.

H.H. Mehta, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 104 of the Civil Procedure Code read with Order 43, Rule 1(r) of the Civil Procedure Code filed by the original defendant No. 1 in Special Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1992

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-1992

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR416; 1993LC654(Bombay)

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Shah, ; V.G. Rege ; and ; K.C. Sidhwa, Advs.

Sujata Manohar, J.1. The appellants are the original respondents. They are hereinafter referred to as the respondents. The respondents to the appeal are the original petitioners. They are hereinafter referred to as the petitioners.2. The petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1994

Ved Prakash Vs. Chaman Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-07-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 441; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 425, 427, 441 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3890

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Shah, Adv.

G.S.N. Tripathi, J.1. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar, vide his judgment and order dated 31-5-1978, acquitted the accused Chaman Singh, Sahab Singh, Bhup Singh and Vishnu Datt on the charges under Section 448, 427, IPC. Therefore,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2006

The Aligarh Muslim University Through Its Vice-chancellor Vs. Malay Sh ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-05-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1981 - Sections 2(1), 5(2), 8, 16, 17, 18, 20A, 21, 22, 23, 26, 26A, 27, 28, 29, 31, 34 and 35; Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920 - Sections 2, 3, 5(9A), 6, 8, 12(2) 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(5), 14, 15, 19, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 28(1), 28(2), 30, 30(2), 32, 32(1), 36, 36(2), 40 and 40(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28); Constitution of India - Articles 26, 28(2), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 32, 226, 245 and 246; Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1961 - Sections 11(1); Kerala University Act, 1969 - Sections 48 and 49; Gujarat University Act, 1949 - Sections 33A

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC992

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Singh,; Sunita Agarwal,; S.S. Ray,; Rajeev Dhavan,; Ashok Khare and; S.A. Shah, Advs.

Ajoy Nath Ray, C.J.1. The short basic issue in all these appeals is whether the Aligarh Muslim University is a minority Institution. The point arises because suddenly some eighty five years after incorporation, they chose for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial