Advanced Search Results
Jai NaraIn and ors. Vs. State
Delhi
Feb-25-1969
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 239
5(1969)DLT648
S.A.K. Dhar and; B.B. Lal, Advs
S.K. Kapur, J.(1) This order will dispose of Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) No. 47 of 1968, and Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) No 91 of 1968, and Criminal Revision Nos. 422, 423 and 434 of 1963. (2) I will...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunder Dev Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Police and anr.
Delhi
Sep-20-1983
Contempt of Court
AIR1984Delhi267; 24(1983)DLT374; 1984(6)DRJ81; 1984(1)SLJ693(Delhi)
S.A.K. Dhar,; A.K. Dhar and; Y.K. Sabharwal, Advs
Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J.(1) This is a contempt petition against the Deputy Commissioner of Police and Additional Commissioner of Police for not sending the petitioner for training for the post of Sub-Inspector (Executive).(2) These are the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSat Pal Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.
Delhi
Apr-28-1972
Service
Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 13.4
ILR1972Delhi888
S.A.K. Dhar,; A.K. Dhar,; D. Chaudhary,;
B.C. Misra, J. (1) This order will dispose of three Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 116, 127 and 136 of 1971 arising out of a common judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 25th March, 1971 by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Yoginder Pal Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Jul-21-1983
Service
Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 12; Delhi Police Act, 1861 - Sections 149
25(1984)DLT429; 1983(5)DRJ357; 1984LabIC542
S.A.K. Dhar,; A.K. Dhar and; O.P. Sharma, Advs
A.B. Rohatgi, J. (1) The future of these petitioners hangs In the balance. They are 23 Young men of about 25 years of age. They are 'strong and well proportioned youths'. They have chosen to become...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunder Dev Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Nov-18-1982
Service
Delhi Police (Appointment and Recruitment) Rules, 1980 - Rule 7
23(1983)DLT115; 1983LabIC1013; 1983RLR36; 1983(2)SLJ145(Delhi)
S.A.K. Dhar,; C.L. Choudhry and; O.P. Sharma, Advs
Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J.(1) These two writ petitions raise one question. It is about the height of a departmental candidate who wishes to appear in the competitive examination for the post of Sub-inspector (executive). The qualifications...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKailash Wati Bajaj Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Feb-14-1972
Service
Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 13.1(3)
ILR1972Delhi692; 1973LabIC954
S.A.K. Dhar and; B. Kirpal, Advs
Jagjft Singh, J. (1) Lady Head-Constables Kailash Wati Bajaj, Narinder Kaur, Krishna Kumari and Sumitra Devi belong to the Delhi Police Force. Out of them Shrimati Kailash Wati Bajaj was the senior-most but her name was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKartar Singh Vs. Union of India, Etc.
Delhi
Sep-14-1982
Service
Criminal Law Amendment Act; Police Restriction of Rights Act - Sections 29; Police (Incitement to Disaffection) Act - Sections 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860
ILR1983Delhi446
S.A.K. Dhar and; O.P. Sharma, Advs
M.L. Jain, J.(1) The petitioner Kartar Singh was enlisted as a Constable on 15-2-1951 and was confirmed on 13-9-1954. He was promoted as Constable selection grade on three years probation on 1-12-1969. He passed lower school...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Yogender Pal Singh
Delhi
May-15-1984
Service
Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 149; Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 12.14 and 12.15
26(1984)DLT263
Y.K. Sabharwal and; S.A.K. Dhar, Advs
Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) This is an appeal under clause of the Letters Patent of Punjab High Court as applicable to this Court, by the Union of India challenging, the judgment of a learned Single Judge directing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhopal Singh Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Nov-03-1978
Service
Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 14; Central Civil Service (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 5
15(1979)DLT93; 1979LabIC860
S.A.K. Dhar and; Charanjit Talwar, Advs
Rajindar Sachar, J. (1) This petition was filed in this court challenging the dismissal of the petitioner by the Commandant, Delhi Armed Police by his order of 9th July, 1968. The appeal filed, and then further...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.R.K. Talwar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Nov-24-1976
Property
Public Premises (Eviction of Unanthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 9
AIR1977Delhi189; ILR1977Delhi138
S.A.K. Dhar and; Sital A.K. Dar, Advs
V.S. Deshpande, J. (1) An interesting question arising for decision in this writ petition relates to the construction of sub-section (4) of section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised occupants) Act, 1958 [now corresponding...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »