Advanced Search Results

S.R.i. Roller Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1992(59)ELT361(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Vikram S. Nankani, ;M.N. Gavankar, ;Anil Balani, ;L.D. Balani,; M.L. Bansal, ;Dr. D.V. Chandrachud and ;Shri S.A. Divan, Advs.

Sujata Manohar, J.1. These writ petitions challenge the levy of inspection fees in respect of inspection inter alia, of plants and seeds imported into India. These fees are levied under Clauses 3(12) and 12 of the...

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai versus M/S R.V. Anderson Assoc ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 3 S.C.R. 525

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Ananya Nair, Ms. Nivedita Nair, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair

[2026] 3 S.C.R. 525 : 2026 INSC 228Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. M/s R.V. Anderson Associates Limited (Civil Appeal No(s). 3277-78 of 2026) 11 March 2026 [J.K. Maheshwari* and Atul S. Chandurkar, JJ.]Issue for ConsiderationWhether...

Shashin Patel and Anr. versus Uday Dalal and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 2 S.C.R. 381

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Tushita Ghosh, Ms. Tanishka, Ms. Bedotroyi Gupta, Ms. Pratima Mishra

[2026] 2 S.C.R. 381 : 2026 INSC 125 Shashin Patel and Anr. v. Uday Dalal and Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 795 of 2026) 05 February 2026 [Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta,* JJ.]Issue for ConsiderationWhether the belated...

Hindustan Cocoa Products Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR555; 1994LC662(Bombay); 1994(74)ELT525(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.A. Diwan and ;Mr. C.M. Mehta, Advs., i/b.,;M/s. Gagrat & Company

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Division-II, Thane, dated 6th May, 1985 rejecting its claim for refund of excise duty amounting to Rs. 1,80,301.38 in...

S.R. I. Roller Mills Pvt. Ltd. and Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 245, 265 and 372; Plants, Fruits and Seeds (Regulation of Import into India) Order, 1989; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946; Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1988 - Sections 61 and 63

Reported in : AIR1992Bom79; 1992(59)ELT361(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Vikram S. Nankani,;N.N. Gavankar,;Dr. Dy. Chandrachud,;Anil Balani,;L.U. Balani and;M.L. Bansal, Advs.

ORDERMrs. Sujata Manohar, J.1. Thesewrit petitions challenge the levy of inspection fees in respect of inspection inter alia, of plants and seeds imported into India. These fees are levied under clauses 3(12) and 12 of the...

Pannalal Bhansali versus Bharti Telecom Limited & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 3 S.C.R. 493

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Veda Singh, Ms. Aashvi P. Shah, M/s. Udit Kishan And Associates

[2026] 3 S.C.R. 493 : 2026 INSC 213 Pannalal Bhansali v. Bharti Telecom Limited & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 7655 of 2025) 10 March 2026 [Sanjay Kumar and K. Vinod Chandran,* JJ.]Issue for ConsiderationIssue arose whether...

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. Maharashtra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL543

1. Heard M/s J.J. Bhatt, Sr. Advocate, Anjali Chandurkar, Syed Naqvi and Smieetaa Inna Advocates appearing for Appellant. Dr. G.M. Phadke, Mr. Shantanu Dixit appearing in person, M/s Gaurav Joshi, Alpara Dhaka, Shyam Divan, Mr. Rajiv...

The Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. Vs. the Director of E ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 8(3 and 4)

Reported in : 2000(1)BomCR466

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Divan and ;H.N. Vakil i/b ;Mulla and ;Mulla, Advs.

ORDERShafi Parkar, J. 1. The appellants have taken exception to the penalty imposed by the two authorities below, imposing penalty of Rs. 2,500/- on the appellants for the alleged contravention of sub-sections (3) and (4) of...

Telco Ltd. Vs. Dir. of Enforcement of the Fera Board

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 8(3) and 8(4); Customs Act; Customs Regulations

Reported in : 2000(68)ECC253; 2000(115)ELT618(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Divan and ;H.N. Vakil, Advs., i/b., ;Mulla and Mulla

Shafi Parkar, J.1. The Appellants have taken exception to the penalty imposed by the two authorities below, imposing penalty of Rs. 2,500/- on the appellants for the alleged contravention of Sub-sections (3) and (4) of Section...

Jamshed N. Guzdar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay City Civil Court and Bombay Court of Small Causes (Enhancement of Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 1; Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution of India - Articles 2, 3, 4, 14, 19(1), 138, 214, 226, 230, 246, 247 and 254; Bombay High Court Letters Patent (Amendment) Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Act, 1977 - Sections 19; North America Act - Sections 101; Advocates Act, 1961; Calcutta City Civil Court (Amendment) Act, 1969; Andhra State Act, 1953 - Sections 28; States Reorganisation Act, 1956; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

Reported in : AIR1992Bom435; 1992(3)BomCR494; (1992)94BOMLR984

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr. Advocate,;Aspi Chinoy,;Milind Sathe,;S.A. Divan and;J.R. Gagrat, Advs.;C.M. Mehta, Adv. i/b;M/s. Gagrat and Co

ORDER1. The Petitioner, who is the Chairman of Airfreight Limited and claims to be the Director of 14 other Public Companies espousing the cause of litigants in Greater Bombay, by way of public interest litigation has...