Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rohit deo · Page 1 of about 35 results (0.027 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 11 2005

Bank of India Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2 and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-11-2005

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR865; [2006(107)FLR1019]; 2005(4)MhLj115

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Jaiswal, Adv. in W.P. No. 85 of 1992 and ;Rohit Deo, Adv. in W.P. No. 1522 of 1992

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Heard Shri Rohit Deo, Advocate for the workmen and Shri Jaiswal, Advocate for the employer-Bank.2. Both these writ petitions challenge the award dated 26-8-1991 delivered by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2005

Laxmibai Prakash Buty and ors. Vs. Rent Controller and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-08-2005

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR267; 2006(1)BomCR334

Advocate for Appellant : Rohit Deo, Adv.

Gavai B.R., J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties, Shri D.P. Thakare, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2008

Smt. Nirmalabai D. Kale and ors. Vs. Shri Madan S/O Shri Balaji Ratan, ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-2008

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 416 and 416(2); Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 6 - Schedule - Articles 7 and 23; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 201, 202, 203, 204 and 205; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 21, Rule 90 - Order 29, Rule 1

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR747; 2009(1)BomCR309

Advocate for Appellant : Rohit Deo, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The matter has been heard on 11.09.2008 and thereafter on 12.9.2008. It was required to be kept today for judgment as Shri Ghare, learned Counsel for the non-applicant wanted to cite some authority...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 29 2004

Vasudeobhai Jadhaoji Rathod and ors. Vs. Neela Prabhulal Rathod and an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-29-2004

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Partnership Act - Sections 69(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2005(2)ALLMR196; 2005(3)BomCR315

Advocate for Appellant : Rohit deo, Adv.

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners/original defendants challenged order dated 6th September, 2004 passed by Second Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur below Exh....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2005

Harish S/O Gajanan Agrawal Vs. Bank of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-31-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970 - Rule 4.12, 5, 6, 8, 9; Bank of Maharashtra Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 - Regulations 4 and 8(1); Bank of Maharashtra Officer Employees' (Conduct) Regulations, 1976 - Regulation 13(1) and 13(2)

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR382; 2006(3)BomCR491; 2006(2)MhLj110

Advocate for Appellant : Rohit Deo, Adv.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Mr. Rohit Deo, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. S. Ghate, learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2009

Shri Shriram Vishwanath Vs. the Presiding Officer, Central Government ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-18-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 11A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Canara Bank Service Code

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj587

Advocate for Appellant : Rohit Deo, Adv.

A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 7.8.2000 passed by the C.G.I.T-Cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur, in I.D.A Reference No. R/78/96, answering the reference in the negative, the present writ petition was filed in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2002

Gouri Food Products Vs. Priya Trading Co.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-26-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 18, Rule 1

Reported in : 2002(6)BomCR218; 2002(4)MhLj880

Advocate for Appellant : Lokhande, Adv. holding for Rohit Deo, Adv.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Lokhande, learned Advocate, holding for Mr. Rohit Deo, counsel for the applicant. None appears for the respondent. 2. The applicant has assailed the order, dated 8-8-1995, passed below Exh. 23 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2010

Smt. Zaibunnisa D/O Late Mohd. Din, Aged About 68 Years, and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Sep-17-2010

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227; Code of Civil procedure - Section Order IX Rule 5, 5(1), 5(1)(c), 6, (1)(b) , 151

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rohit Deo, Adv.

1. On 18/6/2010 this Court has issued notice for final disposal and accordingly Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been heard finally by issuing Rule and making it returnable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2016

Rattan India Power Limited Vs. The State of Maharashtra through the Ch ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : May-05-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.D. Dewani

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of certiorari and after setting aside adverse orders, a direction to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2016

Sanjay Narayanrao Meshram Vs. The Election Commission of India through ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jun-07-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. R.D. Dhande

Oral Judgment: (B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a citizen of India, claims that Respondent No. 7 has become disqualified and, therefore, ceases to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial