Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rishikesh · Page 1 of about 870 results (0.204 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 27 2007

Achi Ramulu (Died) Per Lrs. Vs. Kunapareddy Vijaya Kumar (Died) Per Lr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-27-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 - Order 21, Rules 58, 97 to 101

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD765; 2008(1)ALT437(NULL)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Ramachandra Prasad, Adv.

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal, under Section 100 of C.P.C., is filed against the concurrent judgments, rendered in an application filed under Rules 97, 98, 99 and 101 of Order 21 C.P.C.,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1999

Harish Chandra Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-12-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC45

Advocate for Appellant : H.P. Dube and ;Ashok Khare, Advs.

O. P. Garg, J.1. These are three connected writ petitions, raising common questions of fact and law and, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. Harish Chandra-Petitioner was appointed as clerk-cum-Cataloguer on 10th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2011

Saudagar Singh Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-16-2011

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971(PP Act)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rishikesh, Adv.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? No 1. Both these writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 27 2004

Rohtash Vs. M.C.D. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-27-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act

Reported in : 2004(76)DRJ657

Advocate for Appellant : Rishikesh, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. Rule.With the consent of parties writ petition is taken up for disposal.2. The relevant facts, as urged by the counsel for the petitioner and relevant for disposal of this writ petition are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2005

Shri Prakash Dwivedi Son of Shiv Pratap Dwivedi Vs. District Inspector ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-27-2005

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3) and 172(2); Uttar Pradesh High School and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971 - Sections 5 and 6(3); Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services and Selection Board Act, 1982 - Sections 21, 33A(1C) and 35; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission (Procedure for Approval of Punishment) Regulations, 1985 - Regulations 5 and 8; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission (Procedure for Approval of Punishment) Rules, 1985 - Rule 8

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3349; 2005(4)ESC2482

Advocate for Appellant : Wajahat Husain Khan, ;Rishikesh Tripathi, ;P.N. Saxena and ;Puneet Kumar Gupta, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. A clear vacancy of a teacher in Commerce in L.T. Grade arose in D.A.V. Intermediate College, Banda. The Committee of Management appointed Sri Prakash Dwivedi on 1.3.1986 on an adhoc basis up to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2005

Jeet Singh Vs. Delhi Power Supply Company Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-07-2005

Subject : Service

Reported in : 116(2005)DLT617; 2005(80)DRJ197; [2005(105)FLR724]; 2006(2)SLJ245(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Rishikesh, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner, by this petition, seeks quashing of the order of punishment imposed and prays for exoneration. Petitioner had joined the services of respondent as Junior Clerk on 3rd November, 1966. In due course,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1987

Union of India Vs. Globe Trading Corporation and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-08-1987

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : 1988(14)DRJ253; 1988RLR148

Advocate for Appellant : Arjun Bhandari and; Rishikesh, Advs

D.P. Wadhwa, J.(1) The only question that arises for decision in this appeal is if the arbitrator could award interest for the period during which arbitration proceedings were pending before him. This question has arisen in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1999

Hari Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IAD(Delhi)450; 83(2000)DLT436; 2000(54)DRJ595

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rishikesh, Adv

ORDERN.G. Nandi, J.1. The question involved in this Writ Petition is whether an Air Force Personnel taking voluntary retirement before completion of the qualifying service in Air Force, would be entitled to the encashment of entire...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2001

Jayashree G. Naik Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-19-2001

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15, 15(4), 16 and 16(4)

Reported in : 96(2002)DLT591; 2002(62)DRJ681; 2003(1)SLJ44(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Rishikesh, Adv

Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for quashing of the show causenotice issued by respondents 3 & 4 directing the petitioner to show cause as to why she should notbe...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2003

D.C. Raizada Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-12-2003

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)589; AIR2003Delhi200; 105(2003)DLT737; 2003(69)DRJ26

Advocate for Appellant : Rishikesh, Adv

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. By this common judgment, I would be deciding is 2390/98, being an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, filed by the petitioner in this case, seeking a transfer of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial