Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rishad murtaza · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.015 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 25 2003

Babban Alias Babbu Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2715

Advocate for Appellant : Rishad Murtaza, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-detenu Babban alias Babbu has impugned the order dated 11th June 2002 passed by the second opposite party...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2003

Zair Vs. the District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-10-2003

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2004CriLJ116

Advocate for Appellant : Rishad Murtaza, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this writ petition, preferred under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, the petitioner detenu Zair has impugned the order dated 27-4-2003 passed by Mr. M.A. Khan, District Magistrate, Hardoi (opposite party...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2010

Ashwani Garg and Others. Vs. State of U.P.,thru. Prin. Secy., Home and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-22-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 507 Read with 3 or 4, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ;

Advocate for Appellant : Rishad Murtaza, Adv.

1. Heard Shri Rishad Murtaza, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Satyendra Kumar Singh learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 3 and the learned Additional Government Advocate, who has accepted notices on behalf of opposite...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 21 2023

Pawan Kumar Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-21-2023

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : VANSHAJA SHUKLA __ ROHIT K. SINGH

1 REPORTABLE2023INSC1012IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3548 OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) No.7957 OF2021 PAWAN KUMAR …APPELLANT Versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. …RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.Leave granted.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2008

Bhoop Singh (Dead) and anr. Etc. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-09-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ161

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Rishad Murtaza

ORDERAlok K. Singh, J.1. Both these appeals arise out of the judgment and order dated 4-7-1988 passed by IV Additional Sessions Judge, Barabanki in Sessions Trial No. 334 of 1987, therefore they were heard together and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2003

Vijay Prakash Misra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-11-2003

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2717

Advocate for Appellant : Rishad Murtaza, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1.Through this petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner-detenu Vijay Prakash Misra alias Darhi Misra has impugned order dated 7-9-2002 passed by the second opposite party Sri Suresh Chand Sharma,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2007

imran Ali Vs. Habibullah and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-19-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007(4)SCALE610

Advocate for Appellant : Samir Ali Khan,; Rishad Murtaza,; Amit Kumar and;

ORDER1. We have heard counsel for the parties.2. It is no doubt true that the High Court felt persuaded to grant bail to the respondents in the pending appeal before it. The High Court however, went...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2009

Kailash Nath Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-10-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307

Advocate for Appellant : K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv.,; Rishad Murtaza,; M. Shoeb Alam

ORDER1. The prosecution story is as under:1.1 Chhoti - P.W. 1, the complainant in the case was earlier married to Kallu Singh of village Tendwar, P.S. Maholi, District Sitapur and had three sons from him namely,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 2010

Khannu Vs. State of U.P. Thur. Principal Secy.,home Deptt. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-26-2010

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Rishad Murtaza, Adv

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State as well as perused the documents available on record. 2. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial