Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ravish agrawal · Page 1 of about 98 results (0.040 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 15 2006

Ajit P.K. Jogi Vs. National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Schedu ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Dec-15-2006

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2007Chh90

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Mahindra Shrivastava

S.R. Nayak, C.J.1.This writ petition preferred under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the proceedings of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, the first respondent herein registered in file...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2002

Laxminarayan Vs. Shivlal Gujar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-03-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 16 and 16(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR2003MP49; [2004(1)JCR203(MP)]; 2002(4)MPHT463

Advocate for Appellant : Ravish Agrawal, Sr. Adv., Amicus Curiae;N.S. Kale, Sr. Adv. and ;Harvindar Singh, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. The term 'Law' is applied and taken recourse to herald the incandescent attributes of civilisation with stupendous felicity and the advancement of society is conditioned by the appropriate legal evolution. Sometimes the law...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2000

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rafeeka Sultan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-26-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2001ACJ648; 2000(3)MPLJ561

Advocate for Appellant : Ravish Agrawal, Amicus curiae and ;S.K. Seth, AAG;Virendra Verma and ;Sanjay Agrawal, Advs.

Bhawani Singh, C.J. 1. Whether insurance company can challenge quantum of compensation under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure or under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is the question for determination in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 2006

Digital Weighing Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Food Corporation of India and o ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Feb-06-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR2006Chh68

Advocate for Appellant : Ravish Agrawal, Sr. Counsel and; P.S. Koshy, Advs.

ORDERS.R. Nayak, C.J.1. The petitioner is a Private Ltd. Company engaged in business of manufacturing and services of weighing systems. The petitioner was supplier of weighing systems to the Food Corporation of India, the first respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1998

Chandrawati Wd/O Surjanram and ors. Vs. Ganesh Prasad Lakshmi Prasad a ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-18-1998

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 41A(5); Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 165(9) and 165(6); Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 17; Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 - Order 41, Rule 22 - Order 42, Rules 1 and 2; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65; Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Ordinance, 1975 - Sections 17

Reported in : 1999(1)MPLJ107

Advocate for Appellant : Ravish Agrawal, Adv.

C.K. Prasad, J.1. This is plaintiff's (since dead) second appeal under Section 100 Civil Procedure Code. He died during the pendency of the appeal and this appeal is being pursued by his legal representatives. Plaintiff filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2002

Sunil Kumar and anr. Vs. Smt. Anguri Choudhari and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-01-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63 and 65

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT432; 2002(3)MPLJ371

Advocate for Appellant : Ravish Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ;Pranay Verma, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') the applicants have called in question the sustainability of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2000

The Chairman, GramIn Vidyut Sahkari Samiti Maryadit and Two ors. Vs. R ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 5; Court Fees (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1997

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT173

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Chaudhary, Adv.;Ravish Agrawal, Adv. as amicus curiae

ORDERS.C. Pandey, J.1. This is a reference under Section 5 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 (henceforth 'the Act'). The Taxing Officer was of the opinion that the appellant was liable to pay court fees at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2003

Pradeep Chouksey and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sctions 2(10), 2(21) and 3; Madhya Pradesh Amendement Act, 2002 - Schedule 1A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 45

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT131

Advocate for Appellant : Ravish Agrawal and ;J.P. Sanghi, Sr. Advs., ;Ajay Ojha and ;N.K. Upadhyay, Advs.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. As in both the writ petitions challenge is to the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') they were heard analogously and are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1998

Vimal Kumar Vs. Gyanchand and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-30-1998

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1999MP264

Advocate for Appellant : Ravish Agrawal, Adv.

C.K. Prasad, J. 1. This is second appeal by defendant No. 2 against the judgment of affirmance. Plaintiff-respondent No. 1 filed the suit for specific performance of contract, perpetual injunction and in the alternative, for recovery...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2000

Dr. Suresh Kumar Verma Vs. Smt. Hemlata Verma

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-04-2000

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rules 4 and 13; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13, 21 and 24; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2001(1)MPHT384

Advocate for Appellant : Shri J.L Mishra, Adv.;Shri Ravish Agrawal, Sr. Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code (for short 'the Code') the husband-petitioner has called in question the legal propriety of the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial