Advanced Search Results

Mohammad Mian Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 309; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167, 167(2) and 437(6); Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2621

Advocate for Appellant : Ravindra Sharma, Adv.

ORDERB.P. Singh, J.1. The applicant, Mohammad Mian, is being prosecuted for committing the offence punishable under section 302 I.P.C., P.S. Ojhani, District Budaun.2. According to recital in the F.I.R., Budha was shot dead by the applicant,...

Mannu Bobal vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dev Kumar, Mr. Vikas Kumar, Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Mr. G. Sharma, Mr. Jaskaran, Mr. Dev Kumar, Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Mr. G. Sharma, Mr. Jaskaran

$~39 & 40 Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2485/2026 MANNU BOBAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dev Kumar and Mr. Vikas Kumar, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir...

Vishal Bobal & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dev Kumar, Mr. Vikas Kumar, Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Mr. G. Sharma, Mr. Jaskaran, Mr. Dev Kumar, Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Mr. G. Sharma, Mr. Jaskaran

$~39 & 40 Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2485/2026 MANNU BOBAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dev Kumar and Mr. Vikas Kumar, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir...

The General Manager, UCO Bank and Another Vs. Shri Jitendra Kumar Shri ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

CAV Order: 1. Renowned issue that emanates for consideration in this writ petition is whether the employer (petitioners herein) is justified in forfeiting the amount of gratuity payable to the employee (respondent herein) on the ground...

Gufran Ahmad and anr Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian penal code (IPC) - sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 506 and 120-B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 161.; Criminal Law Amendment Act - Section 7

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Kumar Pandey; Anil Kumar Shukla; Shri Satish Trivedi, Advs

1. These two bail applications have been filed relating to the same case crime no. 34 of 2005 under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 506 and 120-B IPC and section 7 of the Criminal Law...

Narendra Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. S.S. Chandel

1. THIS appeal emanates from the impugned judgment and order dated 14.3.1983 passed by IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur in S.T. No. 2 of 1982, State Vs. Narendra and others, by which learned trial Judge has...

Faqira and Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Surendra Kumar, J. 1. THREE accused persons Faqira (appellant No. 1), Rawahil @ Rawshil (appellant No. 2) (real brothers being sons of Tehsin) and their cousin brother Furkan (appellant No. 3), son of Yamin, residents of...

Bachcha Rai Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Advocate for Appellant : Siya Ram Shahi, Adv

V.N. Sinha, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.Petitioner has challenged office order No. 877 dated 4.4.2006, Annexure-11, whereunder Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department of the State Government, Respondent No. 2 has...

Atique Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3431

Advocate for Appellant : S.M.A. Kazmi, ;K.S. Hanif and ;Ravindra Sharma, Advs.

R.K. Dash, J. 1. Factual aspects of all these cases being almost similar, they were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. For better appreciation, we would refer to the allegations made...

M.A. Rasheed Jameel Vs. the General Manager, S.C. Rly and

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The applicant M.A. Rasheed Jameel was initially appointed as Health Inspector Grade III(HI-III) during 1990 in South Central Railway. By order No. P/MD/9/98 dated 23.2.1998 the applicant alongwith two other Health Inspectors was transferred from...