Advanced Search Results

Punjab State Electricity Board and ors. Vs. Jagjiwan Ram and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act; Rajasthan Service (Concessions on Project) Rules, 1962 - Rules 2(7), 4(2), 4(4) and 42; Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951; Pay Scale Rules; Haryana Service of Engineers, Class-II, Public Works Department (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1970; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Punjab State Electricity Board (Revised Pay) Regulations, 1988 - Regulation 8

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW1884; JT2009(3)SC400; (2009)IIILLJ216SC; (2009)3SCC661; 2010(1)SLJ22(SC); 2009(2)LC899(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Satinder S. Gulati,; Kamaldeep Gulati,; Kailash Chand,;

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Leave granted.2. With a view to give relief to the employees who were stagnating in particular positions for a long period of time, the Punjab State Electricity Board [for short, 'the Board'] introduced...

Om Prakash and ors. Vs. the District Judge and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13, 13(3), 13(4) and 13(5); Limitation Act - Sections 5; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 15(7); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj924

Advocate for Appellant : Manoj Bhandari, Adv.

Dinesh Maheshwari, J.1. The plaintiff-petitioners have submitted this writ petition being aggrieved of the order dated 16.9.2004 whereby the District Judge, Bikaner allowed Civil Appeal (Order) No. 52/2004 filed by the defendant-tenant and set aside the...

Universal Incast Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority Securities and Exchange ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 69, 69(4), 73, 73(3) and 149; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 22

Reported in : [2002]108CompCas248(P& H); (2000)125PLR256

Advocate for Appellant : Harbhagwan Singh,; J.S. Yadav and; Ravinder Kumar, A

ORDERIqbal Singh, J. 1. M/s. Universal Incast Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner-company) made a public issue of 29.9 lakh equity shares. The issue opened on 12-2-1996 and closed on 22-2-1996. Basis of allotment was...

Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and Another Vs. Ashok Kumar Se ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 32, 136, 136(1), 141, 142, 215, 226, 309, 311 and 330; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96; Punjab Public Works Department (Electricity Branch) Provincial Services Class III (Subordinate Posts) Rules, 1952 - Rules 6 and 9; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Punjab Electricity Board Service of Engineers (Civil) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 10(4)(6), (7) and (9); Limitation Act

Reported in : AIR1990P& H117; (1991)IILLJ165P& H

Advocate for Appellant : H.L. Sibal, Sr. Adv. and; J.P. Sandhu, Adv.

ORDERM. M. Punchhi, J. 1. These 23 matters are indeed an assortment having common axis in Letters Patent-Appeal No. 402of 1988 which has arisen from a judgment rendered by M. R. Agnihotri, J., a learned Judge...

Smt. Santosh Rani and anr. Vs. Nand Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Haryana Urban Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1973 - Sections 13(2) and 15(6)

Reported in : (2000)125PLR175

Advocate for Appellant : Harsh Rekha, Adv.

V.S. Aggarwal, J1. The present revision petition had been filed by Smt. Santosh Rani and another (hereinafter described as 'the petitioners') directed against the judgment of learned Appellate Authority, Sirsa dated 10.12.1982. By virtue of the...

Damu Yeshwant Naik Vs. Smt. Timotina Barreto and Others

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

U.V. Bakre, J. This Second Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 25/02/2004 passed by the learned Additional (III) District Judge, South-Goa at Margao (First Appellate Court), in Regular Civil Appeal No.24 of 2001....

Bodh Raj @ Bodha and ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25 to 26 and 27

Reported in : AIR2002SC3164; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)268; 2002CriLJ4664; 2002(4)Crimes182(SC); 2003(3)JKJ88[SC]; 2002(6)SCALE266; (2002)8SCC45; [2002]SUPP2SCR67

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar and; U.R. Lalit, Sr. Advs.,; M. Aslam Gooni,

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. These four appeals relate to a Division Bench judgment of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court dated 31.7.2000. While Criminal Appeal No. 921/2000, 791/2001, 792/2001 have been filed by the accused, Criminal Appeal...

Ravinder Kumar Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A

Reported in : 2005CriLJ84

Advocate for Appellant : Jaswant S. Jain, Adv.

V.K. Bali, J.1. Appellant Ravinder Kumar, who was tried along with his co-accused Sudhir Kumar and Shanti Devi, has since been held guilty for offences under Sections 304-B and 498-A of Indian Penal Code and sentenced...

Ravinder Kumar @ Ravi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 3, 20, 26 and 64; Juvenile Justice Act, 1986; Rajasthan Children Act, 1970; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 5, 7A, 9, 9(1), 10, 12(1), 12(3), 12(16), 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(1), 16, 16(1), 16(2), 20, 25, 64 and 65; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 201, 302 and 364; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Constitution of India - Articles 15, 39, 45 and 253

Reported in : 2008(103)DRJ27

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Mishra, Adv

Reva Khetrapal, J.1. Two young boys, the appellants Amit Kumar and Ravinder Kumar, with another young boy named Suman are alleged to have murdered Noor Alam @ Shibu, aged 5 years in the night intervening 9th/10th...

Naregbam Shyamkanhai Singh Vs. State of Manipur

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Advocate for Appellant : A. Nilarnani Singh and A. Bimol, Advs.

Ranjan Gogoi, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and order dated 6.8.1992 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Manipur East, Imphal in Sessions Case No. 37/88/23/88/27/90 convicting the accused-appellant under Section 302 of...