Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ravinder kumar · Page 1 of about 1,281 results (0.146 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 12 2009

Punjab State Electricity Board and ors. Vs. Jagjiwan Ram and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-12-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act; Rajasthan Service (Concessions on Project) Rules, 1962 - Rules 2(7), 4(2), 4(4) and 42; Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951; Pay Scale Rules; Haryana Service of Engineers, Class-II, Public Works Department (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1970; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Punjab State Electricity Board (Revised Pay) Regulations, 1988 - Regulation 8

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW1884; JT2009(3)SC400; (2009)IIILLJ216SC; (2009)3SCC661; 2010(1)SLJ22(SC); 2009(2)LC899(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Satinder S. Gulati,; Kamaldeep Gulati,; Kailash Chand,;

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Leave granted.2. With a view to give relief to the employees who were stagnating in particular positions for a long period of time, the Punjab State Electricity Board [for short, 'the Board'] introduced...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2006

Om Prakash and ors. Vs. the District Judge and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-17-2006

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13, 13(3), 13(4) and 13(5); Limitation Act - Sections 5; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 15(7); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj924

Advocate for Appellant : Manoj Bhandari, Adv.

Dinesh Maheshwari, J.1. The plaintiff-petitioners have submitted this writ petition being aggrieved of the order dated 16.9.2004 whereby the District Judge, Bikaner allowed Civil Appeal (Order) No. 52/2004 filed by the defendant-tenant and set aside the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2019

Om Prakash vs.iocl Officers Welfare Society & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Mr. Plaintiff

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h January, 2019 OM PRAKASH CS(OS) 590/2016 Through: Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav and Mr. ..... Plaintiff Versus Vinayak Sharma, Advs. IOCL...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 28 2014

Vinod Sharma and Ors Vs. State (Nct of Govt of Delhi) and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-28-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ravinder Kumar

$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5418/2014 VINOD SHARMA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocate with Petitioners in person versus STATE ( NCT OF GOVT OF...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2014

Vinod Sharma and Ors Vs. State (Nct of Govt of Delhi) and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-28-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ravinder Kumar

$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5418/2014 VINOD SHARMA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocate with Petitioners in person versus STATE ( NCT OF GOVT OF...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 1999

Universal Incast Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority Securities and Exchange ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-15-1999

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 69, 69(4), 73, 73(3) and 149; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 22

Reported in : [2002]108CompCas248(P& H); (2000)125PLR256

Advocate for Appellant : Harbhagwan Singh,; J.S. Yadav and; Ravinder Kumar, A

ORDERIqbal Singh, J. 1. M/s. Universal Incast Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner-company) made a public issue of 29.9 lakh equity shares. The issue opened on 12-2-1996 and closed on 22-2-1996. Basis of allotment was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2018

Pooja Pahwa vs.mahinder Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-23-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Ms. Preeti Singh

$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d January, 2018 C.R.P. 14/2018 & CM Nos. 2598-99/2018 POOJA PAHWA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav & Ms. Preeti Singh,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1989

Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and Another Vs. Ashok Kumar Se ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-13-1989

Subject : Constitution Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 32, 136, 136(1), 141, 142, 215, 226, 309, 311 and 330; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96; Punjab Public Works Department (Electricity Branch) Provincial Services Class III (Subordinate Posts) Rules, 1952 - Rules 6 and 9; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Punjab Electricity Board Service of Engineers (Civil) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 10(4)(6), (7) and (9); Limitation Act

Reported in : AIR1990P& H117; (1991)IILLJ165P& H

Advocate for Appellant : H.L. Sibal, Sr. Adv. and; J.P. Sandhu, Adv.

ORDERM. M. Punchhi, J. 1. These 23 matters are indeed an assortment having common axis in Letters Patent-Appeal No. 402of 1988 which has arisen from a judgment rendered by M. R. Agnihotri, J., a learned Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2017

Wimpy International Ltd. Vs.gulshan Dhingra

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-19-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Ms. Arti Anupriya, Ms. Preeti Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1053/2017 + % WIMPY INTERNATIONAL LTD. Through:19. h December, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Advocate with Ms. Arti Anupriya, Advocate and Ms. Preeti...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2000

Smt. Santosh Rani and anr. Vs. Nand Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-2000

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Haryana Urban Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1973 - Sections 13(2) and 15(6)

Reported in : (2000)125PLR175

Advocate for Appellant : Harsh Rekha, Adv.

V.S. Aggarwal, J1. The present revision petition had been filed by Smt. Santosh Rani and another (hereinafter described as 'the petitioners') directed against the judgment of learned Appellate Authority, Sirsa dated 10.12.1982. By virtue of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial