Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ravi varma · Page 1 of about 394 results (0.171 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 03 1983

Roopa Ravindra Kankanawadi Vs. Commissioner, Hubli-dharwar Municipal C ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-03-1983

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 16(4)

Reported in : ILR1986KAR88

Advocate for Appellant : G.B. Raikar, Adv.;Mukunda Menon and ;Ravi varma Kumar, Advs.

ORDERRama Jois, J.1. In this Writ Petition presented by a lady Teacher on the establishment of the High School under the management of the Hubli-Dharwar Municipal Corporation ('Corporation' for short) seeking for the issue of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2004

Premanand Shetty K. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-25-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 33N; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rule 50A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2004(4)KarLJ417

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi varma Kumar, Sr. Adv. for J. Prashanth and ;V.R. Sarathi, Advs.

ORDERR. Gururajan, J.1. This petition is filed seeking for a direction in the nature of quo warranto ousting the second respondent from the post of Drug Controller after quashing the notification Annexure-A, dated 12-6-2004.2. Petitioner states...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1989

M. Papanna Vs. Hon'ble Chief Justice

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-01-1989

Subject : Service

Acts : High Court of Karnataka Service Rule, 1973; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 76

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1328; 1989(2)KarLJ372

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi varma Kumar, Adv.

ORDERK.A. Swami, J1. At the stage of preliminary hearing, learned Government Pleader was directed to take notice on behalf of first respondent and to produce the records. Accordingly, learned Advocate General has appeared on behalf of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 21 2005

Dr. B. Kaladhar and ors. Vs. Government of A.P., Health, Medical and F ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-21-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 to 16, 16(1), 16(4), 46, 309 and 371D; Income Tax Act; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rules 22

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD1; 2005(6)ALT723

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Rao, ;Ravi Varma Kumar and ;Bojja Tarakam, Sr. Advs. and ;V. Raja Manohar, ;K. Ashok Reddy, ;Nooti Ram Mohana Rao, ;Ancha Panduranga Rao, ;K. Chinna Baba, ;S. Ashok Anand Kumar and ;Y. Vivekanand

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. While most of the principles relating to Hindu Law were decided in the cases which arose under the Income Tax Act, those relating to reservation of seats in educational institutions fall for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2012

B. Sridhara Murthy Vs. the Bangaluru Development Authority and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-22-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

Advocate for Appellant : Prof. Ravi Varma Kumar, Sr. Adv.

(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order/letter dated 18.8.2009 forwarded under letter dated 9.10.2009, vide Annexure-V issued by the second respondent to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2019

Shri Rahul Sofat vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-28-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ravi Varma

20 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 101/2015 SHRI RAHUL SOFAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Varma, Advocate Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent None...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2008

Sanjay Gurjar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-29-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(2)MPHT174

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ravi Varma

ORDERN.K. Mody, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 5-6-08 passed by Ilnd Additional Sessions Judge, Ratlam in Criminal Appeal No. 122/08, whereby the learned Sessions Court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 52 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2026

M/S Dhanvine Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs Delhi Jal Board and Anr,

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-05-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Amit Sibal, Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Mr. Harsh Bora, Ms. Simran Rao

$~36 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 05th February 2026+ W.P.(C) 1019/2026 & CM APPL. 5048/2026 M/S DHANVINE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. HOUSE No. 97, SECOND FLOOR, BANK...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2026

M/S Ayyappa Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd vs Delhi Jal Board and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-05-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Amit Sibal, Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Mr. Harsh Bora, Ms. Simran Rao

$~36 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 05th February 2026+ W.P.(C) 1019/2026 & CM APPL. 5048/2026 M/S DHANVINE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. HOUSE No. 97, SECOND FLOOR, BANK...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1989

B.K. Adarsh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-06-1989

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3A to 3D, 4, 4A, 4(1), 4A(1), 4(1A), 4-A(2), 4(3), 5, 5A, 5-B, 5B(1), 5-B(2), 5-C, 5, 6-B, 8 and 9; Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 1981 - Sections 3 and 20; Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983 - Rules 2, 7, 22 to 24 and 24(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(2) and 226; Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 1974 - Sections 6; Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 1984; Cinematograph Censorship Rules, 1958; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 292

Reported in : AIR1990AP100

Advocate for Appellant : B. Subhashan Reddy, Adv.

ORDER1. The Petitioner had produced a film titled 'SEX VGYAN' (Sex Education) and applied on Sept., 18, 1987 to the Addl. Regional Officer, Central Board of Film Certification, at Hyderabad (4th respondent) for certification under S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial