Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ravi varma · Page 1 of about 302 results (0.076 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 03 1983

Roopa Ravindra Kankanawadi Vs. Commissioner, Hubli-dharwar Municipal C ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-03-1983

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 16(4)

Reported in : ILR1986KAR88

Advocate for Appellant : G.B. Raikar, Adv.;Mukunda Menon and ;Ravi varma Kumar, Advs.

ORDERRama Jois, J.1. In this Writ Petition presented by a lady Teacher on the establishment of the High School under the management of the Hubli-Dharwar Municipal Corporation ('Corporation' for short) seeking for the issue of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1989

M. Papanna Vs. Hon'ble Chief Justice

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-01-1989

Subject : Service

Acts : High Court of Karnataka Service Rule, 1973; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 76

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1328; 1989(2)KarLJ372

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi varma Kumar, Adv.

ORDERK.A. Swami, J1. At the stage of preliminary hearing, learned Government Pleader was directed to take notice on behalf of first respondent and to produce the records. Accordingly, learned Advocate General has appeared on behalf of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2004

Premanand Shetty K. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-25-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 33N; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rule 50A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2004(4)KarLJ417

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi varma Kumar, Sr. Adv. for J. Prashanth and ;V.R. Sarathi, Advs.

ORDERR. Gururajan, J.1. This petition is filed seeking for a direction in the nature of quo warranto ousting the second respondent from the post of Drug Controller after quashing the notification Annexure-A, dated 12-6-2004.2. Petitioner states...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 21 2005

Dr. B. Kaladhar and ors. Vs. Government of A.P., Health, Medical and F ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-21-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 to 16, 16(1), 16(4), 46, 309 and 371D; Income Tax Act; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rules 22

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD1; 2005(6)ALT723

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Rao, ;Ravi Varma Kumar and ;Bojja Tarakam, Sr. Advs. and ;V. Raja Manohar, ;K. Ashok Reddy, ;Nooti Ram Mohana Rao, ;Ancha Panduranga Rao, ;K. Chinna Baba, ;S. Ashok Anand Kumar and ;Y. Vivekanand

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. While most of the principles relating to Hindu Law were decided in the cases which arose under the Income Tax Act, those relating to reservation of seats in educational institutions fall for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2012

B. Sridhara Murthy Vs. the Bangaluru Development Authority and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-22-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

Advocate for Appellant : Prof. Ravi Varma Kumar, Sr. Adv.

(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order/letter dated 18.8.2009 forwarded under letter dated 9.10.2009, vide Annexure-V issued by the second respondent to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2026

M/S Dhanvine Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs Delhi Jal Board and Anr,

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-05-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Amit Sibal, Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Mr. Harsh Bora, Ms. Simran Rao

$~36 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 05th February 2026+ W.P.(C) 1019/2026 & CM APPL. 5048/2026 M/S DHANVINE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. HOUSE No. 97, SECOND FLOOR, BANK...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2026

M/S Ayyappa Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd vs Delhi Jal Board and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-05-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Amit Sibal, Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Mr. Harsh Bora, Ms. Simran Rao

$~36 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 05th February 2026+ W.P.(C) 1019/2026 & CM APPL. 5048/2026 M/S DHANVINE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. HOUSE No. 97, SECOND FLOOR, BANK...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1989

B.K. Adarsh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-06-1989

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3A to 3D, 4, 4A, 4(1), 4A(1), 4(1A), 4-A(2), 4(3), 5, 5A, 5-B, 5B(1), 5-B(2), 5-C, 5, 6-B, 8 and 9; Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 1981 - Sections 3 and 20; Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983 - Rules 2, 7, 22 to 24 and 24(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(2) and 226; Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 1974 - Sections 6; Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 1984; Cinematograph Censorship Rules, 1958; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 292

Reported in : AIR1990AP100

Advocate for Appellant : B. Subhashan Reddy, Adv.

ORDER1. The Petitioner had produced a film titled 'SEX VGYAN' (Sex Education) and applied on Sept., 18, 1987 to the Addl. Regional Officer, Central Board of Film Certification, at Hyderabad (4th respondent) for certification under S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2016

M/s. Nagpur Distillers Private Limited and Another Vs. The State of Ma ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jan-08-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. Considering the nature of controversy and as requested by the parties, matters have been heard finally at the stage of admission by issuing Rule, and making it returnable forthwith. 2. Briefly stated,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1974

Amrit Lal Berry and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-10-1974

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 8; Constitution of India - Articles 16, 32 and 226

Reported in : AIR1975SC538; (1975)ILLJ144SC; (1975)4SCC714; [1975]2SCR960; 1975(1)SLJ44(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : D.L. Singhvi,; S.K. Mehta,; M and;

M.H. Beg, J.1. Amrit Lal Berry in Writ Petition No. 463 of 1971 and K. N. Kapur & 14 others in Writ Petition No. 2004 of 1973 have applied to this Court under Article 32 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial