Advanced Search Results
Pardeep @ Sonu Vs. State
Delhi
Mar-25-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376, 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313, 161, 164, 391
Mr.Ravi Gupta; Ms.Priyanka Gupta, Advs.
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES2. To be referred to the reporter or not? YES3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? YES1. The appellant has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProvogue (India) Td Vs. Naveen Kholi
Delhi
Jan-15-2008
Arbitration/Property
Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act - Sections 14(1), 41 and 42; Registration Act; ; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 107; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 63; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
2008(104)DRJ627
Ravi Gupta; Rishi Kapoor; Ankit Jain an; Sunil Baisla, Advs
S. Ravindra Bhar, J.LA. No. 525/2008 (Exemption C. Fee)Learned Counsel states that the balance Court fee would be paid during the course of the day. Let the application disposed in terms of the statement.LA. No. 524/2008...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsha M. JaIn Vs. the Canara Bank and ors.
Delhi
Oct-15-2001
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 58; Transfer of Properties Act, 1882 - Sections 40, 53A and 54; Specific Relief Act - Sections 3 and 27; Trust Act - Sections 91; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17; Indian Contract Act - Sections 202
94(2001)DLT841; 2002(61)DRJ101
Ravi Gupta, Adv
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. The appellant, who purchased property No. A-27/C, DDA Flat Munirka, New Delhi, on a power of attorney basis is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 31.10.1990 dismissing the objection filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Anand Prakash Singal and 3 ors. Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors ...
Delhi
Aug-05-2005
PropertyCivil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 6
122(2005)DLT715; 2005(83)DRJ723
Ravi Gupta, Adv
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. The petitioners allege that they own lands which fall within Khasra Nos. 71/1 (4-04), 71/2(4-04), 71/3(4-04),71/4/1 (1-17), 71/7/2 (2-02), 71/8(4-16), 71/9 (4-16), 71/10 (4-10), 71/11 (4-16), 72/5 (4-08)m 72/6 (4-10) situated in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSh. Chaman Lal JaIn Vs. Sh. Arun Kumar JaIn and Others
Delhi
May-23-1995
CivilCommercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56
AIR1996Delhi108; 1995(34)DRJ615
Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv. and; Ravi Gupta, Adv
ORDER1. The applicant Mr. Jagdish Parsad Gupta has by this application challenged the compromise decree passed vide order dated 20th December, 1988. In order to appreciate the challenge made against the said decree, the relevant and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMks Projects (India) Ltd. Vs. Svc Superchem Ltd.
Delhi
Apr-02-2003
ArbitrationContract
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11 and 11(6); Arbitration Act, 1940
2003(2)ARBLR170(Delhi); 2003(68)DRJ18
Ravi Gupta and; Meenakshi Arora, Advs
R.C. Jain, J. 1. The above named petitioner has filed this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (in short the 'Act') seeking appointment of an Arbitrator in accordance with the terms...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChaman Lal JaIn Vs. Arun Kumar JaIn and ors.
Delhi
May-23-1995
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3
ILR1996Delhi518
Mukul Rohatagi,; Ravi Gupta and; Satish Chander, Advs
Usha Mehra, J. (1) The applicant Mr.Jagdish Parsad Gupta has by this application challenged the compromise decree passed vide order dated 20th December,1988. In order to appreciate the challenge made against the said decree, the relevant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Mahinder Kumar (Since Deceased) Through His L.Rs. Vs. Smt. Seema
Delhi
Aug-09-2001
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 21, Rule 26; Constitution of India - Article 227
93(2001)DLT591; 2001(60)DRJ436
Mr. Ravi Gupta, Adv
ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. The contention of the Petitioner/Tenant is that both the Courts below have committed an error of law in dismissing the Tenant's Objections dated 16.12.1999, filed under Section 47 read with Order XXI, Rule...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.C. Taneja Vs. Pramod Kumar Taneja
Delhi
Dec-06-1996
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17
1997IAD(Delhi)53; 1997(41)DRJ160
A.K. Sikri,; Shailesh Kapoor and; Ravi Gupta, Advs
M.K. Sharma, J. (1) This order shall dispose of the application being I.A. No. 2825/1995 filed by the plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code praying for amendment of the plaint. The plaintiff instituted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajinder Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Apr-24-2007
Property
Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 5A and 6
148(2008)DLT502; 2007(95)DRJ638
Ravi Gupta, Adv
J.P. Singh, J. 1. In this Petition it is prayed that a Writ, Order and/or direction in the nature of Certiorari be issued for quashing the Notification dated 25.11.1980 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »