Advanced Search Results
Lucknow Grih Swami Parishad Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Apr-20-2000
Service TaxCivil
Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Sections 2(2), 25, 25(2), 30, 44, 52 to 64, 66(4), 72, 96, 97, 98, 99, 99(2), 100; Constitution of India - Articles 47, 51A, 243 and 288(1); Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 5(1) and 59(1); Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act; State Municipal Act; Panchayat Act; Uttar Pradesh Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959 - Sections 114, 173, 173(2), 269 to 271; Uttar Pradesh Nagar Mahapalika Water Supply Rules, 1968 - Rules 10, 11 and 25 to 30; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(6)
2000(3)AWC2139; (2002)3UPLBEC2351
K.B. Jindal, ;H.S. Jain, ;V.R. Singh, ;Nirmal Tiwari, ;Umapati Rai, ;Vimal Kumar, ;Vireshwar Nath, ;B.B. Chauhan, ;K.B. Sinha and ;Km. Vishwa Mohini, Advs.
A.K. Yog, J. (Backdrop)1. These six petitions give rise to the controversy pertaining to duties and obligation of 'Local-Bodies' (as part of local self Government) to ensure 'water-supply', within their area, for which said authorities are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnand Kumar Dubey Vs. State of U. P. and Others
Allahabad
Aug-03-2000
Service
U. P. Public Services (Reservation for Physically Handicapped, Dependents of Freedom Fighters and Ex-Servicemen) Act, 1993 - Sections 3 and 5; Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependent of Government Servant Dying in Harness Rules, 1974
2001(1)AWC274
Ratnesh Lal, Adv.
Naseemuddin, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. The only controversy in the present writ petition is whether the petitioner is entitled to the reservation of 2% quota...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRashid Ahmad Khan Vs. Tej NaraIn and anr.
Allahabad
Mar-06-1997
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunals) Act, 1976 - Sections 5A
(1997)3UPLBEC1558
Ratnesh Lal and ;S.K. Kalia, Advs.
K.C. Bhargava, J.1. This is an appeal against the order dated 31-7-1996 passed by the U. P. Public Services Tribunal in Contempt Petition No 172 of 1993.2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›