Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Pam Developments Pvt. Ltd.
Kolkata
Oct-28-2003
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11 and 34
2004(2)ARBLR480(Cal),2004(1)CHN407
Rathindra Nath Das, ;Jayanta Banerjee and ;Sarajit Sen, Advs.
1. This is an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the 'said Act' in short) for setting aside of the award made and published on January 25, 2002 by Mr. Satyabrata...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.K. Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kolkata
Sep-19-1979
Labour and Industrial
(1980)IILLJ105Cal
M.M. Dutta, J.1. In this appeal, the appellant has challenged the propriety of the judgment of a learned single Judge discharging the Rule obtained by the appellant on his application under Article 226 of the Constitution.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunny Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Oct-26-1988
Service Tax
(1989)(19)ECC306
1. The question that arises in the present appeal relates to the classification of "AD Vitamin Massage Oil Forte" manufactured by the appellants. Till 16-3-1985 this item was being classified under Tariff Item 14E as patent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Mita Pal and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Oct-07-2005
Constitution
Army Act, 1950 - Section 106; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 491; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 226 and 226(1)
2006CriLJ1647
Paresh Ch. Maity and ;B.C. Simai, Advs.
ORDER1. Leave is granted to the learned Advocate for the petitioners to amend the cause title. Just desert.2. While appreciating the anguish of the Petitioner, who has come up before this Court with a lurking apprehension...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Imperial Tobacco Co. of India Ltd. Vs. the Registrar of Trade Mark ...
Kolkata
Jun-14-1977
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Section 9, 9(1), 9(4) and 9(5)
AIR1977Cal413,81CWN885
Noni Coomar Chakravarti, ;Rathindra Nath Das and ;B.C. Bachawat, Advs.
Salil Kumar Datta, J.1. This isan appeal from the judgment and order of P. B. Mukharji, J. (as his Lordship then was) dated May 24, 27 and 28, 1968 in an appeal under Section 109 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Maya Biswas and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-07-2008
Service
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 26; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 2 - Order 42, Rule 2
(2008)2CALLT336(HC),[2008(118)FLR902]
Rathindra Nath Das and ;Naba Kumar Das, Advs.
1. This application initially is directed against three orders, namely, first one is dated 1st February 1999 passed by a Division Bench, second one is dated 27th of August 1999 passed by a learned single member,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India vs Smfg India Credit Co. Ltd.,
Karnataka
Jul-23-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 6723 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: STATE BANK OF INDIA,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›