Advanced Search Results

Nath Bank Ltd. Vs. Andhar Manick Tea Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10, 13 and 44A; ;Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 18

Reported in : AIR1960Cal779,[1960]30CompCas306(Cal),64CWN161

Advocate for Appellant : Ranadeb Chaudhuri, Adv.

ORDERH.K. Bose, J.1. This matter comes up before me by way of an application for exception, to a report dated 12-2-1957 made by the Assistant Referee of this Court in a reference directed by a consent...

The Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. Vs. the State of Rajasthan a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 132, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 307 and 392; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951 - Sections 4 and 11; Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules - Rule 23

Reported in : AIR1962SC1406; [1963]1SCR491

S.K. Das, J.1. These are three consolidated appeals which arise from the judgment and order of a Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court dated August, 9, 1957. They have been preferred to this Court on the...

Parthasarathi Sinha and ors. Vs. Official Liquidator, Ballygunge Real ... Overruled

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 483, 543, 543(1) and 583

Reported in : [1976]46CompCas555(Cal),79CWN972

Advocate for Appellant : Ranadeb Chaudhuri and ;P.K. Sen, Advs.

Masud, J.1. The important point to be decided in this appeal is whether misfeasance proceeding in connection with a company in liquidation can lawfully proceed against the heirs and legal representatives of an alleged delinquent director...

In Re: East Kajoria Collieries Private Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Mineral Concessions Rules - Rule 37

Reported in : [1965]35CompCas180(Cal),69CWN1

Advocate for Appellant : Ranadeb Chaudhuri, Adv. for the objector;R. Lahiri, Adv.

B.C. Mitra, J. 1. This is an application for an order for winding up of East Kajoria Collieries (P.) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the company) on the ground that the company has failed to pay...

J.K. Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ganges Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 349(4)(1)

Reported in : [1968]38CompCas603(Cal),72CWN618

Advocate for Appellant : Ranadeb Chaudhuri and ;B.N. Sen, Advs.

Sankar Prasad Mitra, J.1. The plaintiff in this suit is a public limited company. The affairs of the defendant are managed by the plaintiff as its managing agents on terms and conditions contained in the managing...

Probodh K. Sarkar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 8; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1953Cal385,56CWN437

Advocate for Appellant : Ranadeb Chaudhuri, Adv.

Bachawat, J.1. This is an application by Mr. B.K. Ghose, Receiver, appointed in Suit No. 420 of 1950 for the appointment of an umpire in place and stead of the late Sri Sarat Chandra Bose and...

K.K. Somani Vs. D.K. Somani and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155 and 155(4); Constitution of India - Article 227; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Rule 1

Reported in : [1986]59CompCas910(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Chandra, Adv.

K.C. Agrawal, J.1. These are three connected special appeals under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the High Court Rules against the order dated 22nd December, 1982, passed by a learned single judge in Company Petition No....

Rajendra Kumar Ruia and anr. Vs. Govt. of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 6 and 6(1); ; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Specific Relief Act - Section 45

Reported in : AIR1952Cal573,56CWN156

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Khaitan and ; K. Basu, Advs.; Anil Kumar Das Gupta, Adv.

Bose, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for a Rule upon the respondents to show cause why Writs in the nature of Mandamus, Certiorari and Prohibition should not issue for direction...