Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ran vijay singh · Page 1 of about 94 results (0.131 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 24 1998

Rajendra Kumar and Others Vs. Lala Shree Chand JaIn and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-24-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1990; II(1999)DMC645

Advocate for Appellant : Murlidhar and ;Ran Vijay Singh, Advs.

O.P. Garg, J. 1. This is defendants' second appeal against the decision dated 16.2.1998 tn First Appeal No. 296 of 1997 decided by Sri M. P. Singh. District Judge, Saharanpur. The said appeal arose out of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 2002

Sita Ram Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-15-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 24 and 25; Constitution of India - Article 39

Reported in : AIR2003All208

Advocate for Appellant : Party in person, ;R.N. Bhalla, ;Kamla Singh and ;P.K. Singh, Adv.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. Writ Petition No. 6226 of 1988 has been filed by Sarv Sri Sita Ram Singh and Daya Shanker Mishra, practising lawyers of this Court seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2002

Ram Chandra Kesari Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-15-2002

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Educational Ministerial Service Rules, 1985 - Rule 7

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1931; (2002)3UPLBEC2395

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Singh, ;A.P. Shahi, ;G.K. Singh, ;R.G. Padia and ;Prakash Padia, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J. 1. Special Appeal No. 1140 of 2001 has been filed by Ram Chandra Kesari against the judgment and order dated 7.11.2001 passed by the learned single Judge in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 07 2000

Malti Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-07-2000

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4170; I(2001)DMC204

Advocate for Appellant : H.C. Rastogi, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J.1. This revision arises against the judgment dated 17.5.1993 passed in Criminal Revision No. 341 of 1991 by IVth Additional Sessions Judge Budaun allowing the revision and setting aside the order passed in Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2018

Taje Sufiyah Sulaiman vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-2018

Subject : Right to Information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:13. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 7721/2018 & CM No.29602/2018 TAJE SUFIYAH SULAIMAN versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ...... Petitioner ...... RESPONDENTS Advocates who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2002

Anwar Ali Vs. Prescribed Authority/Sub-divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-08-2002

Subject : Election

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12C (1); Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 100 (1)

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC954; (2002)2UPLBEC1197

Advocate for Appellant : Avanish Mishra, Adv.

S.K. Sen, C.J. 1. We have heard Shri Avanish Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant-writ petitioner, Shri S.P. Singh, learned counsel for therespondent No. 5 and Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned standing counsel for the other...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1998

Chunmun Vs. District, Magistrate, Sonbhadra and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-03-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12(1), 95(1) and 110; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947 - Rules 47 and 47A; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 - Rules 3, 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6), 4, 4(1), 5, 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 4(2) and 243B, C, G and H; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1892; (1998)3UPLBEC2061

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

S.R. Singh, J.1. Impugned herein is the order dated 29.5.1998 passed by the District Magistrate. Sonbhadra in purported exercise of powers under the proviso to clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section (95) of the U....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2001

Sadiq Ali and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-29-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Group 'D' Employees Service Rules, 1985 - Rules 16 and 32; Bihar Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 35(3)

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2755; [2001(91)FLR906]; (2001)3UPLBEC2652

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare, ;P.N. Ojha and ;K.D. Tewari, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J. 1. These two special appeals have been filed by the appellant-writ petitioners against a common judgment and order dated 22.1.1998 passed by the learned single Judge whereby the writ petitions filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2002

Bashishtha NaraIn Pandey Vs. Commissioner, Basti and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-24-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2188

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Pandey and ;R.G. Padia, Advs.

R. K. Agrawal, J. 1. Bashishtha Narain Pandey, has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2001

State of U.P. Through Director, Tribal Development Vs. Mohan Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-06-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : (2002)1UPLBEC590

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Kushwaha and ;Ranvijay Singh, Advs.

S.K. Sen, C.J. 1. We are of the view that sufficient ground exists for condonation of delay of 66 days in preferring the special appeal. The delay is accordingly condoned. The application under Section 5 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial