Advanced Search Results

Mr. Ethan SteIn and anr. Vs. Mr. Balkrishna V. Doshi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(6), 14, 14(1), 14(2), 15, 15(1), 15(2) and 16

Reported in : 157(2009)DLT180

Advocate for Appellant : Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. and; Arjun Garg and; Nitin Thukr

Reva Khetrapal, J.1. By this common judgment, I propose to dispose of OMP 115/2008 which is a petition under Section 14(2) read with Section 14(1)(a) and 14(1)(b) and Section 15(2) read with Section 15(1)(a) of the...

Prashant Projects(P) Ltd. Vs. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Section 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 26 Rule 9

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ramji Srinivasan And Ors.

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes CM No.2084/20111. Allowed,...

Gas Authority of India Ltd. Vs. thermax Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 and 34(2); ;Arbitration Act, 1940; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 74

Advocate for Appellant : Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv.,; Navin Kumar and; Surbhi Agarwa

Manmohan, J.1. Present petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1996') challenging the arbitral Award dated 30th March, 2002 passed by Mr. V. Selvaraj,...

Shyam Telelink Limited Versus Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONER: RAMJI SRINIVASAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, RITU BHALLA, JASLEEN K. OBEROI, MONARK SALHOT, ADVOCATE. FOR THE RESPONDENT: MANINDER SINGH, SENIOR ADVOCATE, WITH MRS. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, YOGIND

S.B. Sinha These two petitions being inter-related were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. However, the fact of the matter would be noticed by us separately in each...

D.S. Bindra Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceBanking

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998VIAD(Delhi)837; 1999(48)DRJ94

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner, who was working as Manager of the Punjab & Sind Bank, Ludhiana, was compulsorily retired and that is under challenge. For the purpose of appreciating the questions raised by the petitioner,...

Tata Sky Limited Versus Espn Software India Pvt. Ltd. and Another

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONER: RAMJI SRINIVASAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MANSOOR ALI SHOKET, VINOBA BHOOPATHY, ADVOCATES. FOR THE RESPONDENT: N. GANPATHY, ADVOCATE.

S.B. Sinha The effect of and/or interpretation of an order dated 6.6.2008 passed by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court is in question herein. Petitioner is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, Respondent is...

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Versus Telecom Regulatory Authority of In ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONERS: MANINDER SINGH, YOGENDER HANDOO, KUNAL SOOD, ADVOCATES. FOR THE RESPONDENT: R1, C.S.VAIDYANATHAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH, SAKET SINGH, R2, RAMJI SRINIVASAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH, MA

The three Appeals - 6 of 2006, 5 of 2007 and 5 of 2008 were filed by the Appellant - Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (hereinafter referred to as BSNL) - challenging the Telecommunication Interconnection Usage Charges...

Assam Cable Communications Vs. Zee Turner Ltd

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate, Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Maninder Singh, Senior Advocate, Mrs. Prathiba M. Singh, Mr.

1. This review application has been filed for review of the judgment and decree of this Tribunal dated 28.4.2011 whereby and whereunder while dismissing the petition and allowing the counterclaim filed by the respondent, it was...

Tata Teleservices Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appearing Parties: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Mansoor Ali Shoket, Mr.Nitin Kala, Ms. Vibha Dhawan, Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG, Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr.Kirtiman Singh, Mr. C.S. Vaidyana

The Petitioners herein are licensees; the licences having been granted n terms of Section 4 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (the Act). The 1st Respondent in each of these petitions is the licensor. The 2ndRespondent is...

Cellular Operators Association of India and Others Vs. Department of T ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For Petitioner: Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Manjul Bajpai, Advocate. For Respondent No.1: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate, For Respondent No.2 (BSNL): Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Tej

S.B. SINHA INTRODUCTION Validity of an order/determination passed/issued by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) vis-à-vis the Regulations framed by it is in question in this petition. BACKGROUND FACTS 2. The first petitioner is an Association...