Advanced Search Results
Bishan Das and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-19-1961
Trusts and Societies
Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 60; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 92; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 31, 32 and 226
AIR1961SC1570; [1962]2SCR69
S.K. Das, J.1. This is a writ petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution in respect of a dharmasala, an adjoining temple and some appurtenant shops, standing on a piece of land near the railway station...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohamed Oomer, Mohamed Noorullah Vs. S.M. Noorudin
Mumbai
Aug-13-1951
Intellectual Property Rights
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 561 - Order 41, Rules 22 and 23; Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 70, 74, 76 and 77; Trade Marks Rules - Rules 34 and 36
AIR1952Bom165; (1952)54BOMLR28
N.A. Palkhiwalla, Adv.;C.K. Daphtary, Solicitor General
Chagla, C.J.[1] This is an appeal which arises out of an order made by the Register of Trade Marks. The respondent applied for registration of his trade mark on 21-8-1942. The application was advertised on 1-10-1945,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdambika Pratap NaraIn Singh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P., L ...
Allahabad
May-18-1961
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 6; Securities Act - Sections 2; Public Debt Act - Sections 2(2)
AIR1961All574
K.L. Mishra and ;V.P. Mishra, Advs.
Jagdish Sahai, J.1. The petitioner Raja Jagadambika Pratap Narain Singh was the proprietor of what was known as the Ayodhya Raj before the abolition of Zamindari in this State. He held large properties in the districts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jagdambika Pratap NaraIn Singh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P., a ...
Allahabad
May-18-1961
Direct Taxation
[1963]50ITR678(All)
JAGDISH SAHAI J. (V. Bhargava and B. Upadhya JJ. concurring).The petitioner, Raja Jagdambika Pratap Narain Singh, was the proprietor of what was known as the Ayodhya Raj before the abolition of zamindari in this State. He...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamji Das and anr. Vs. Lala Chhagan Lal and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-18-1922
Civil
AIR1922All282; 69Ind.Cas.745
Stuart, J.1. Bankey Lal held a simple money-decree against Ramji Das and Janki Das, dated the 20th of May 1912. In execution of this decree he attached an enclosure. The 11th of January 1919 was fixed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Chand Bishan Dass Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab, Pepsu, ...
Punjab and Haryana
May-10-1956
Direct Taxation
[1956]30ITR238(P& H)
BISHAN NARAIN, J. - This is a reference by the Appellate Tribunal to this court under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act.The facts of the case are not much in dispute. Amar Chand belongs to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamji Dass Vs. Bhupinder Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-07-1962
Property
Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1950 - Sections 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1898 - Order 9, Rules 6, 6(1), 7 and 13 - Order 17, Rules 1(1) and 2
AIR1962P& H443
Inderdev Dua, J.(1) This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court by means of which he dismissed First Appeal from Order No. 110 of 1957 and affirmed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAditya Prakash and ors. Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-25-1974
Tenancy
1974WLN199
C.M. Lodha, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff-landlords from the appellate judgment and decree by the Additional Civil Judge, Ajmer who upheld the decree against the original tenant Ramjidas, and one sub-tenant Heeralal, but...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Sansar Chand and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-16-1959
LimitationCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 149; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 8 and 8(1); ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56, 73, 126 and 127
AIR1960HP1
L.N. Sethi, Adv.
T. Ramabhadaran, J.C.1. This appeal, by a plaintiff, arises out of a suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 32,726/-/-, representing the balance due to him (the plaintiff) from defendants 1 and 2 (Sansar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyamal Krishna Chakraborty Vs. Sukumar Das and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-27-2001
CriminalContempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 20, 23 and 38; ; Limitation Act - Section 5; ;Government of India Act, 1915 - Section 106; ;Contempt of Courts Act, 1926; ;Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Section 220(1); ;Contempt of Courts Act, 1952; ;Contempt of Court Rules, 1975 - Rule 2(1); ;Calcutta High Court Rules; ;Constitution of India - Articles 32, 42, 128, 129, 141, 142, 215, 225 and 226; ;High Court Act, 1861 - Sections 9 and 11
2002CriLJ60
P.N. Chatterjee, Sr. Adv. and ;Anuradha Mukherjee, Adv.
Asok Kumar Ganguly, J. 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging violation of a judgment and order dated 4-3-99 passed by a Division Bench of Justice Shyamal Kumar Sen [as His Lordship...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »