Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rameshwar puri · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.033 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 27 1998

National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Maya Devi (Smt.) and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-27-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1999)ILLJ1016P& H

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rameshwar Puri

ORDERJawahar Lal Gupta, J. 1. Is the insurance Company liable for the payment of penalty in a case where the employer fails to compensate the workman's family for the injury or death This is short question...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 2006

Smt. Swaran Bawa Vs. Home Secretary (Ut) Administration and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-27-2006

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (2007)145PLR377

J.S. Narang, J.1. The instant application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for seeking condonation of delay of 885 days in filing the Review Application, though registered as Review Application No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1989

Jodhan Mal Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-16-1989

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A(3) and 110B

Reported in : 1990ACJ316; AIR1989P& H296

Advocate for Appellant : Munishwar Puri and; Rameshwar Puri, Advs.

A.L. Bahri, J.1. Jodha Mal (Jodhan Mal), claimant, challenges award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rupnagar Jan. 24, 1984 vide which his claim application was dismissed. Jodha Mal claimed Rs. 50,000/- as damages on account of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 25 1996

Amrik Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-25-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 21, 61 and 85; Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 1996CriLJ3329

Advocate for Appellant : Rameshwar Puri, Adv.

ORDERP.K. Jain, J.1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing F.I.R. No. 48, dated 15-4-1995 registered at Police Station, Ghal Khurd for an offence under Sections 21/61/85...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1997

Deep Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-10-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 21 and 22; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 64 to 66; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945

Reported in : 1997CriLJ3104

Advocate for Appellant : Rameshwar Puri, Adv.

ORDERP.K. Jain, J. 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for quashing F.I.R. No. 5 dated 6-1-1994, registered at Police Station, Moga,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1997

Rajeev Kumar Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-07-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 21, 22 and 52A(1); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1460

Advocate for Appellant : Rameshwar Puri, Adv.

M.L. Singhal, J.1. This is a Criminal Misc. Petition filed under Section 482, Cr. P.C. by Rajiv Kumar whereby he has sought the quashing of FIR No. 59 dated 18-7-1996 registered at Police Station, Sirhind under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1997

Mangi Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-07-1997

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1998(1)WLC625; 1997(2)WLN609

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sudesh Gupta

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance 1949, against the judgment and order dated 09.9.1997, passed by the learned Single Judge in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial