Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ramakrishna · Page 1 of about 6,114 results (0.500 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 02 1998

State Government of Karnataka (irrigation Departement), Ukp, Bheemaray ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-02-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1998(5)KarLJ553

Advocate for Appellant : Sr. C. Ramakrishna, Government Pleader

ORDER1. This civil revision petition under Section 115 of the CPC has been filed by the State of Karnataka challenging the judgment and order dated 14-6-1993 passed by Sri D.A. Lathe, Civil Judge, Yadgir, in Arbitration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2006

K. Yadaiah Vs. Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-28-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 153(6), 153(16) and 187; ;Central Civil Services (Classification' Control and Appeal) Rules - Rule 55A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 99A, 115 and 465; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 311(2)

Reported in : 2006(6)ALT49

Advocate for Appellant : D. Ramakrishna, Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against order dated 7-2-2006 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby he dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing enquiry report dated 23-8-1995 and order of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2006

K. Yadaiah Vs. Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-28-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 99A and 115 - Order 21, Rule 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 465; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 153(16) and 187; Central Civil Services (Classification' Control and Appeal) Rules - Rule 55A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 311(2); Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act

Reported in : 2006(6)ALD254; [2007(112)FLR130]

Advocate for Appellant : D. Ramakrishna, Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against order dated 7-2-2006 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby he dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing enquiry report dated 23-8-1995 and order of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 25 2000

Union of India (Uoi) by Its General Manager, S.C. Railway Vs. T. China ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-25-2000

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2001(1)ALT280

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ramakrishna Rao, SC

B. Prakasha Rao, J.1. The Union of India, through the South Central Railways, is the appellant which seeks to challenge the orders in O.A.A. No. 116 of 1997 dated 8-5-1998 of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2000

Union of India (Uoi) by General Manager, South Central Railway Vs. T. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-25-2000

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2002ACJ751

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ramakrishna Rao, SC

B. Prakasha Rao, J.1. The Union of India, through the South Central Railway, is the appellant which seeks to challenge the orders in O.A.A. No. 116 of 1997 dated 8.5.1998 of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1970

T.T. Krishnamachari Vs. Income-tax Officer, Collection Branch and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-1970

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 230A; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 44A

Reported in : [1970]77ITR651(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : C. Ramakrishna, Adv.

Ramaprasada Rao, J. These two writ petitions are absolutely misconceived. Mr. C. Ramakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, states before us that the relevant facts which arise in these petitions may be summarised thus : '...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2008

Yessay Foodoils (Represented by Its Partners: Mohammed Iqbal S/O Late ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-24-2008

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 108 and 111; Rent Act; Trade Marks Act

Reported in : 2008(5)KCCR3232; AIR2009Kant103; ILR2009KAR724; 2009(9)KarLJ156; 2009(3)AIRKarR352;

Advocate for Appellant : Kukkaje Ramakrishna Bhat, Adv.

V. Jagannathan, J.1. Whether the suit filed by an unregistered partnership firm for possession and mesne profits can be said to be not maintainable in view of the bar under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1997

C. Ramakrishna Vs. Kanisetty Hari Prasad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-20-1997

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1997(2)ALT336

Advocate for Appellant : M.V. Ramana Reddy, Adv.

ORDERRamesh Madhav Bapat, J.1. The present revision petition has been filed by one C. Ramakrishna, son of C. Narayana Swamy, Advocate-cum-Receiver of Bhagwan Sri Venkayya Swamy Humanitarian Mission, Golagamudi, V. Satram, Nellore District, aggrieved by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1952

A.G. Nallaperumal Nattarayar Vs. Singaravelu Seennandar and Kolandayya ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-11-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 9 and 40

Reported in : AIR1953Mad375; (1952)2MLJ681

Advocate for Appellant : K.P. Ramakrishna Ayyar, Adv.

Raghava Rao, J. 1. Mr. Ramakrishna Aiyar has raised an interesting point in this civil revision petition. I have after hearing the elaborate arguments of Mr. Kothandarama Naya-nar on the point in question, come to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 1997

Bombay Tyres Int. Ltd. and anr. Vs. K.S. Prakash (Dead) by Lrs. and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-1997

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Rent Control Act

Reported in : (1997)6SCC69

K.S. Paripoornan and; B.N. Kirpal, JJ.1. The petitioners are the tenants. Their case is that they had obtained a lease dated 10-3-1978 from the landlord (respondent) for a period of 15 years with effect from 1-7-1976...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial