Advanced Search Results
Shyam Charan Lal Vs. Ram Gopal Gupta
Allahabad
Dec-05-2002
Tenancy
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1)
2003(1)AWC489
Deepak Verma, Adv.
S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for quashing the judgment and order dated 24.8.2002 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrahlad Das Vs. Bhagirath Lal
Delhi
Feb-24-1976
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(2) and 39; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 42, Rule 1
AIR1977Delhi129; ILR1976Delhi737; 1976RLR492
Uma Dutta,; T.C. Sharma and; R.P. Bansal, Advs
B.C. Misra, J.(1) This second appeal under section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 59 of 1958, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), has been filed by the tenant against the appellate order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHemant Chemicals Vs. Riverside Industries Ltd. and Others
Mumbai Aurangabad
Oct-03-2012
Education
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of both the sides, heard for final disposal. 2. The proceeding is filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to challenge the judgment and order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. K.K. Shivhare
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-08-1968
Criminal
1968CriLJ1373; 1969MPLJ34
1. This is an appeal against acquittal of the respondent Krishna Kumar Shivhare or K.K. Shivhare alias K.K. Gupta of the offences punishable under Sections 417 and 471, Penal Code. The trial Court convicted him of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Rajesh Kumar Vs. Manmohan Singh, Proprietor and Sachadeva ...
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-28-1996
CriminalBanking
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 5, 132 and 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482
1997CriLJ3273
Sanjiv Gupta, Adv.
ORDERK.S. Kumaran, J.1. Respondent filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 420, I.P.C. on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal against Messrs, Ashok Kumar Rajesh Kumar through its proprietors...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArjun Vs. Smt. Tihari Bai
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-09-1998
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5
I(1999)DMC478
G.S. Ahluwalia, Adv.
D.M. Dharmadhikari, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the husband against the judgment dated 15.3.1995 of First Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Raigarh passed in Civil Suit No. 20A of 1991 rejecting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrakash Singh Thakur Vs. Smt. Bharti
Madhya Pradesh
May-12-2000
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12(1)
AIR2001MP1; II(2000)DMC368; 2000(3)MPHT105; 2000(3)MPLJ439
Ku. Rama Gupta
V.K. Agrawal, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dt. 21-3-97, whereby the petition filed by the appellant/petitioner under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act' for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Firm Gopichand Sarju Prasad and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-09-1970
CommercialConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 299I; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 8 - Order 8, Rule 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
AIR1972MP43; 1971MPLJ898
Rama Gupta, Govt. Adv.
A.P. Sen, J.1. This judgment will also govern the disposal of First Appeal No. 88 of 1965 (Firm Gopichand Sarju Prasad v. The State of Madhya Pradesh) heard along with this appeal.2. These appeals arise out...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMehtar and anr. Vs. the Collector, Durg and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-19-1974
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9, 14, 18, 23 and 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 27
AIR1975MP46
Ku. Rama Gupta, Adv.
Malik, J.1. These appeals are directed against the order of the Additional District Judge, dated the 8th March, 1973, passed in Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 9 of 1971, The principal question that arises for consideration is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Collector Vs. Chaturbhuj Panda and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-28-1961
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11, 18, 23, 23(1), 23(2), 54 and 55; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65
AIR1964MP196
H.L. Khaskalam, Addl. Govt. Adv. and ;Rama Gupta, Dy. Govt. Adv.
Shrivastava, J. 1. This appeal by the Collector, Raigarh, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is directed against the award of the 2nd Additional District Judge, Rai-garh, in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »