Advanced Search Results
State of Rajasthan Vs. Ramrakh and ors.
Rajasthan
Mar-03-1975
Criminal
1975WLN(UC)77
S.N. Modi, J.1. This is an appeal by the State against the order of acquittal parsed by the Sessions Judge, Bikaner in a case under Sections 302, 307, 302/140, 148 and 323/149 I.P.C. instituted against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Alam Saheb Vs. A.P. State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd. an ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-26-2000
Service
2001(1)ALD486; 2001(1)ALT464
Mr. A. Satya Prasad for ;Mr. I. Dakshina Murthy, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioner was employed as Senior Field Assistant with the A.P. State Co-operative Marketing Federation Limited (Markfed) since 1968. While so, in the year 1978, he was working as in-charge, Tobacco purchasing centre at Pattikonda...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankarlal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
May-07-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302
AIR2004SC3559; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)288; 2004CriLJ2874; 2004(5)SCALE815; (2004)10SCC632; 2004(2)LC1069(SC)
V.S. Chauhan,; N. Chaudhary and; T. Raja, Advs
N. Santosh Hegde, J. 1. Appellant has been convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ramsinghnagar for an offence punishable under section 302 IPC and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.100....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Kalawati Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Sep-10-1993
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Rajasthan Police Rules, 1965 - Rule 6.22 and 6.22(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 162 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302
1994CriLJ691; 1994(3)WLC224; 1993WLN(UC)485
Bhagwati Prasad, Adv.
R.S. Verma, J.1. Appellant Kalawati was tried by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Nohar for offences under Section 302 and 302/34, I.P.C. Her mother Rookma and sister Kastoori were also tried with her for offences under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMani Ram and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Feb-01-1994
Criminal
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 25(1) and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 303, 307, 341, 353, 392, 393, 394, 396, 397 and 411; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
1994CriLJ3770; 1994(1)WLN161
H.S. Kharliya, Adv.
J.R. Chopra, J.1. These two jail appeals, one filed by Maniram Thore s/o Kesraram- and another by one Ram Swaroop, s/o Jeewan Ram, are directed against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagwan Sahai and anr. Vs. Satya NaraIn and anr.
Rajasthan
Oct-30-1981
Civil
1981WLN589
Dwarka Prasad Gupta, Act. C.J.1. As both these appeals arise out of the same judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur dated November 18, 1969, they have been taken up together...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Rakh Vyas Vs. Atal Behari Vajpayee Minister for External Affairs a ...
Rajasthan
Jun-09-1978
Constitution
1978(11)WLN304
Mr. Bhoot
G.M. Lodha, J.1. Having heard Mr. M.C. Bhoot at length & after considering the constitutional provisions relating to issues involved in this case, I am of the opinion that the issues raised are of far reaching...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjayab Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Mar-13-1986
Criminal
1986CriLJ1495; 1986(1)WLN550
Mr. Ram Rakh Vyas
S.S. Byas, J. 1. The appellants are eight in number and the appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar dated Jan. 24,1980. By the judgment aforesaid, five of them,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Rakh Vs. Civil Judge and ors
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Feb-26-2013
Education
D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4111/2002 Ram Rakh. vs. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bikaner & Ors. Date of Order ::26. 2.2013 HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.AMITAVA ROY HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. MATHUR Mr.MS Singhvi, Sr.Adv. A/w...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Lodha Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Feb-19-2007
Civil
RLW2007(2)Raj1428
ORDER TO REDUCE THE CONGESTION FROM THE HIGH COURT ROAD:33. This Court by order dated 21.11.2000 also directed the State Government to explore the feasibility of shifting of main offices and Courts including the High Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »