Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ram jee saxena · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.038 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 24 2006

Mohd. Ismil Vs. Iind A.D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-24-2006

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pardesh Urban Buldings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 20(4) and 39; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106, 106(1) and 106(3); Provincial Small Causes Court Act, 1887 - Sections 25

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3395

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Dubey, Adv.

Krishna Murari, J.1. Heard Sri K. K. Dubey learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ram Jee Saxena appearing for the contesting respondent No. 2.2. The facts relevant for the purpose of the case are that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1999

Jagdish Prasad Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, Mathura and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-06-1999

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1) - Rule 18

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC706

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jee Saxena, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order of Prescribed Authority dated 3.5.1985 allowing the application filed by the landlord respondent under Section 21 (1) (a) and (b) of U. P. Act No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1999

Ram Swarup Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-07-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Children Act, 1951 - Sections 2(4), 27 and 29; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304 and 379; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2000CriLJ3926

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jee Saxena, Adv.

M.C. Jain, J.1. These are three connected appeals out of the judgment and order dated 2-8-1980 passed by Sri O.N. Asthana, the then IV Additional Sessions Judge, Mainpuri in Sessions Trial No. 167 of 1979. Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 2010

Smt. Geeta Goel. Vs. State of U.P. and Others.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-02-2010

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Section 47-A(3)

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jee Saxena; Raghuvansh Chandra, Advs.

1. The petitioner is challenging to the order dated 18.2.09 passed by Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Mathura, dated 18.2.09 and the revisional order dated 6.11.09 passed by Additional Commissioner, Agra division Agra, whereby in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1999

Vir Pal and anr. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-18-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : 1999CriLJ2791

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jee Saxena, Adv.

B.K. Sharma, J. 1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 25-5-1978 passed by Sri Girish Chandra, the then Vlth Additional Sessions Judge, Bareilly dated 25-5-1978 in S.T. No. 490 of 1975, whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2002

Ram Ratan Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-01-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307, 323 and 324

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2688

Advocate for Appellant : Samit Gopal, ;Ram Jee Saxena, ;R.L. Verma, ;Satish Trivedi, ;S.C. Shukala and ;L.V. Singh, Advs.

U.S. Tripathi, J. 1. Appellant Ram Ratan has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 29-3-1993 passed by Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur in Sessions Trial No. 339 of 1991 convicting the appellant under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2003

Abdul Wasi Vs. Bhairamdeen Alias Bacchi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(30), 166 and 168; Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 55

Reported in : III(2003)ACC307; 2004ACJ885; 2003(4)AWC2711

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jee Saxena and ;Raghuvansh Chandra, Advs.

S. P. Srivastava, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Insurer-Appellant.2. The appellant feels aggrieved by the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, determining an amount of Rs. 1,20,000 as Just compensation, to which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1999

Attar Singh Vs. Executive Officer, Municipal Board and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-05-1999

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Fundamental Rules - Rules 56

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2497

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jee Saxena and ;A.R. Dubey, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner's service was dispensed with in exercise of Rule 56 of Financial Hand Book, Vol. II, Part II by an order dated 20th July, 1990 containing in Annexure-1 to the writ petition....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1999

Lal Chand Vs. Executive Officer, Municipal Board and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-05-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Retrenchment and Retirement of Servants of Municipal Boards Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 3 and 3(2); Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1960 - Sections 297(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2495

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jee Saxena and ;A.R. Dubey, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner was asked to retire by a notice dated 23rdNovember, 1990 with 3 months pay in lieu of notice. The said order is Annexure-1, since being challenged in this writ petition. Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1995

Deokinandan and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-07-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 323, 435, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 161, 169, 173(2), 190, 190(1), 200, 202, 204, 296 and 296(2)

Reported in : 1996CriLJ61

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jee Saxena, Adv.

ORDERI.S. Mathur, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 3-6-1992, passed by the VII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buland-Shahr summoning the petitioners under Sections 307/323/435/504/506, I.P.C. and the order dated 12-1-1993 whereby the learned IX...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial