Advanced Search Results
Ramaswamy Palledar Vs. Secretary to the Government of Nct of Delhi and ...
Delhi
May-12-2000
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
2000VIIAD(Delhi)128; 2000(56)DRJ646; [2000(86)FLR682]
Mr. Rakesh Tikku and; Mr. V. Manohar, Advs
ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. Petitioner in this case was working as 'Palledar' with respondent No. 2 namely, Super Bazaar Cooperative Stores Limited. On 20th July, 1991 he was suspended in contemplation of disciplinary proceedings against him thereafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaj Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
May-04-1999
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
79(1999)DLT565
Vineet Bhagat, Adv
K. Ramamoorthy, J.1. Mr. Raj Kumar is the writ petitioner in CW 3833 of 1997 and CW 876/98. In CW 3833 of 1997 the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:'(i) Issue a writ of certiorari...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.K. Mina Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Delhi
Jan-24-2000
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226
2000IIIAD(Delhi)242; 2000(52)DRJ814
Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Adv
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner, who is working as Chief Engineer (Civil) in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, has filed the writ petition seeking for the regularisation of his appointments in the grades of EE(C), SE(C)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ankush Jain vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4
Delhi
Aug-21-2019
Right to Information
Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Mr. P. Roy Choudhary, Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Ms. Jyotsna Mehta, Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Ms. Maninder Acharya, Mr. Zoheb Hossain
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t August, 2019 Decided on:21. t August, 2019 + ANKUSH JAIN W.P. (C) 6541/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVaibhav Jain vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4
Delhi
Aug-21-2019
Right to Information
Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Mr. P. Roy Choudhary, Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Ms. Jyotsna Mehta, Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Ms. Maninder Acharya, Mr. Zoheb Hossain
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t August, 2019 Decided on:21. t August, 2019 + ANKUSH JAIN W.P. (C) 6541/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrilochan Singh Gill Vs. Union of India anr.
Delhi
Feb-25-1985
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226; All India Service (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16(2A)
27(1985)DLT349
M.N. Tikku,; Rakesh Tikku,; D.K. Kapur,;
S.S. Chadha, J.(1) This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeks the quashing of the notification date July 2, 1979 notifying the voluntary retirement from service by the petitioner, a member...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs. Saumya Chopra vs.university of Delhi and Ors.
Delhi
Dec-18-2018
Education
Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Mr. Iqram Govind Singh, Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Ms. Slomita Rai, Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Mr. Subhash Garg, Mr. Naveen Kr. Singh, Ms. Deepali Gupta, Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, Mr. Suraj Kr, Mr. Shivendra Singh, Mr. Atul Kr. Sharma
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:18. h December, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12929/2018 MS. SAUMYA CHOPRA Through: ........ Petitioner Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Adv. with Mr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLeeladhar Kachroo Vs. Umang Bhat Kachroo
Delhi
Jun-08-2005
FamilyCivil
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 12 and 12(1)
121(2005)DLT218; II(2005)DMC193; 2005(82)DRJ609
Rakesh Tikku and; Kirti Uppal, Advs
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. The petitioner/husband and the respondent/wife, both Canadian citizens married in the year 1987 in India at Delhi. Two children, named Arjun Kachroo and Bhareth Kachroo were born to them. The dispute of custody...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDabriwala Steel and Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Aaifr
Delhi
Dec-16-1996
SICACompany
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15
1997IAD(Delhi)248; [1998]91CompCas197(Delhi); 65(1997)DLT48; 1997(40)DRJ415
Rakesh Tikku,; A.K. Sanghal,; K.L. Chopra and;
Manmohan Sarin, J. (1) The petitioner in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing of orders dated 6.12.1994, Annexure P/10; order dated 25.5.1993, Annexure...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.L. Khashu and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-13-2004
Service
2006(2)SLJ109(Delhi)
Rakesh Tikku, Adv
Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioners 12 in number, have filed the present writ petition seeking quashing of the decision of respondent No. 3 posting petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 to Udhampur branch of respondent No. 3 vide...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »