Advanced Search Results
Unitron Ltd. Vs. Unicorp Industries Ltd.
Delhi
Oct-27-1993
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434
[1997]89CompCas736(Delhi)
Rakesh Sawhney and; Ms. Richa Mainee, Advs
Smt. Usha Mehra, J.1. Unitron Limited, the petitioner, herein has sought winding up of Unicrop Industries Ltd. (hereinafter called 'the company') on the ground of its inability to pay the petitioner's debt. The respondent company placed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskO.L., Acme Finance P. Ltd. Vs. Krishan Gopal
Delhi
Jun-07-1974
CompanyCriminal
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 554(5)
1975RLR170
Asha Goel and; Rakesh Sawhney, Advs
D.K. Kapur, J.(1) [M/S Acme Finance P. Ltd. was ordered to be wound up on 7.2.69. Its directors were required to submit statement of affairs within 21 days which they failed to do in spite of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBausch and Lomb India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Registrar of Co., Delhi and Ha ...
Delhi
Mar-29-2000
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 468, 472 and 482; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 72(2A) and 73(2B);
2000VAD(Delhi)334; 85(2000)DLT409; 2000(53)DRJ819
Mr. Rakesh Sawhney, Adv
ORDERD.K. Jain, J.1. A short but interesting question that arises for consideration in the instant case is whether the offence under Section 73(2B) read with Section 72(2A) of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act')...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Modiluft Ltd. (Now Known as Royal Airways Ltd.)
Delhi
Jul-29-2003
Company
Companies Act - Sections 235 to 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2) and 393; Company Court Rules, 1959 - Rules 67, 69 and 79
106(2003)DLT217; 2003(71)DRJ397; [2003]47SCL227(Delhi)
Rajiv Sawhney, Sr. Adv.,; Niraj Sharma and; Jasleen Oberoi
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This is an application, moved on behalf of the Royal Airways Limited (hereinafter referred to as `the RAL') under Section 391(1) and 393 of the Companies Act read with Rule 67 & Rule...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Rajiv Lochan Vs. Shri Narender Nath
Delhi
Sep-01-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 37, 114, 151, 152 and 153 - Order 47, Rule 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 340; Constitution of India - Articles 137, 142(1) and 145; Madras City Tenants Protection Act - Sections 9(3A); Punjab Courts Act, 1918 - Sections 21(2), 25 and 26
2003VIAD(Delhi)152; AIR2004Delhi48; 106(2003)DLT427; 2003(70)DRJ649
Om Prakash, Adv
R.C. Jain, J.1. This case raises an important question of law-- 'Whether an order passed by an Additional District Judge ( referred to as Superior Court) during the pendency of the trial may be reviewed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskModi Spg. and Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Nagar Palika, Modi Nagar and Ano ...
Allahabad
Aug-23-1999
SICA
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22(1) and (3)
1999(4)AWC3374; (1999)3UPLBEC2083
Bharti Sapru, ;K. Gulati, ;Rakesh Sawhney and ;Sudhir Chandra, Advs.
Binod Kumar Roy and Lakshmi Bihari, JJ.1. The prayer of thepetitioner is to quash the order dated 15th February, 1992 passed by the Executive Officer. Nagar Palika, Modi Nagar contained in his letter dated 15th June,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Engineering Mazdoor Sangh
Supreme Court of India
Nov-20-2006
Labour and Industrial
Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33, 33(1) and 33A; Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (Recruitment and Promotions) Regulations, 1980
AIR2007SC920; JT2006(10)SC635; 2007MPLJ443(SC); RLW2007(3)SC1819; 2006(12)SCALE156; (2007)1SCC250; 2009(1)SLJ448(SC); 2007AIRSCW667; 2007-I-LLJ-704(SC)
Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv.,; V.N. Koura,; Rakesh Sawhney,;
Altamas Kabir, J. 1. When the application being I.A. No. 7/06 for revocation of the leave granted, filed by the respondent-union, was taken up for hearing, the appeal itself was taken up for disposal.2. The Oil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskApollo Tyres Limited Vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. and ors.
Delhi
Sep-12-1986
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34
1987(1)ARBLR45(Delhi); 30(1986)DLT519
Rakesh Sawhney and; Y.K. Sabharwal, Advs
Mahesh Chandra, J. (1) This order would dispose of application filed under -Section 34 of the Arbitration Act by defendant No. 2.(2) The facts giving rise to this application are that the plaintiff had filed a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrishla JaIn Vs. Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. and anr.
Delhi
Sep-13-1989
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 113
[1990]67CompCas125(Delhi); 39(1989)DLT403
K.N. Bhat,; Rakesh Sawhney,; Harkiran Kalra,;
S.N. Sapra, J.(1) The present petition has been filed by Mrs. Trishla Jain, under Section 113(3) of the Companies Act, 1956, (hereinafter called the Act), against respondents, thereby claiming the following reliefs : '(a) to pass...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmrik Chand Vs. Harbans Singh
Delhi
May-25-1970
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)
7(1971)DLT125
B. Kirpal,; Rakesh Sawhney and; Sardar Bahadur, Advs
T.V.K. Tatachari, J.(1) This judgment will dispose of two Second Appeals, S.A.O. Nos. 92 and 306 of 1968.. Amrik Chand is the appellant in both the second Appeals, and Harbans Singh is the respondent in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »