Advanced Search Results
Dinesh Sharma Son of Sri Jagdish Prasad Vs. Zakir HussaIn College of E ...
Allahabad
Dec-01-2005
Constitution
2006(1)AWC364
H.P. Singh and ;Rakesh Pandey, Advs.
Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioner was admitted in the B.Tech. Civil Engineering Course of the Aligarh Muslim University in the Session 2001-02 in Zakir Hussain College ofEngineering and Technology. Me successfully completed his first year examination,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Rajni Sharma and ors. Vs. Fateh Chand Sharma and anr.
Allahabad
Aug-17-2009
Family
2010(1)AWC381
Sri. Rajiv Kumar Srivastava
S.K. Gupta, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dated 7.12.2004 and 29.1.2005, passed by Additional District Judge (Special Judge, E.C. Act) Ghaziabad in Misc. Case No. 222 of 2002, Fateh Chand Sharma and Anr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFakire Lal Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Feb-10-1999
ConstitutionService
Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunals) Act, 1976 - Sections 5 and 5(B)
1999(2)AWC926; (1999)3UPLBEC2282
Rakesh Pandey, Adv.
M. Katju and Kamal Kishore,JJ.1. Heard Sri Rakesh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. We have also heard Sri S. C. Budhwar, learned senior Advocate, and Sri A. Kumarand Sri S. A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sone Lal Sankhwar Vs. Chairman-cum-managing Director, U.P. Power Corpo ...
Allahabad
Oct-31-2002
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Electricity Board (Employees Retirement) Regulations, 1975 - Regulation 2 and 2A; ;Uttar Pradesh Electricity Board (Employees Retirement) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 1993; Uttar Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1999
(2003)1UPLBEC95
Rakesh Pandey and ;R. Pandey, Advs.
N.K. Mehrotra, J.1. The petitioner, Sone Lal Sankhwar, was an Executive Engineer in U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. He was compulsorily retired by the respondent on 22.4.2002. He has filed this writ petition for quashing the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Mohanlal Malik
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-26-2013
Education
Shri. Rakesh Pandey
MCC No.739/2013 26/6/2013: Shri Rakesh Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Atul Choudhary, learned counsel for the respondents. This application has been filed for restoration of W.P.No.2451/2005. Having heard Shri Rakesh Pandey, learned counsel for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Mohanlal Malik
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-02-2013
Education
Shri. Rakesh Pandey
R.P.No.708/2013 2/9/2013: Shri Rakesh Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri Atul Choudhary, learned counsel for the respondent. This application has been filed by the applicants indicating that on wrong assumption and by some error committed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSushil Kumar Vs. Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hapur and Oth ...
Allahabad
Sep-20-1999
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(11), 47, 47(1) and (3), 50, 50(2) and 146 - Order 21, Rules 16 and 35; Constitution of India - Article 227; Transfer of Proprty Act, 1882 - Sections 52
2000(1)AWC336
Rakesh Pandey, Adv.
D. K. Seth, J.1. Original Suit No. 179 of 1989 was decreed by the learned trial court. An appeal thereout, being number 198 of 1993, was also dismissed. A review application filed before the appeal Court,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.K. Tiwari and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Allahabad
Aug-09-2001
Service
Indian Defence Service of Engineers (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1991 - Rules 2, 3 to 7; Military Engineering Service (Army Personnel) Recruitment, 1989; Constitution of India - Articles 309 and 335; Military Engineer Services (Army Personnel) Regulations, 1989
2001(3)AWC2377; [2001(91)FLR693]; (2001)3UPLBEC2105
Rakesh Pandey and ;T.P. Singh, Advs.
G.P. Mathur, J.1. Both the writ petitions have been filed challenging the same order dated 8.2.2000 of Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad (C.A.T.) and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order. Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAlgu Vs. District Magistrate and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-01-2002
Commercial
Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 81; Uttar Pradesh Municipal Board Surcharge Rules, 1948 - Rules 3, 4 and 6
2002(3)AWC2530; (2002)3UPLBEC2717
Rakesh Pandey, Adv.
G. P. Mathur and R. B. Misra,JJ.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed praying that the order dated 7.7.1998 passed by District Magistrate, Azamgarh for recovery of amount of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyam Bahadur Vs. Bank of Baroda and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-30-2004
Service
(2005)IILLJ89All; (2004)3UPLBEC2622
K.M.L. Hajela, ;Anil Hajela and ;Rakesh Pandey, Advs.
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri Rakesh Pandey for petitioner. No one appears for respondents. On 18.3.2004, the Court had clarified that no further adjournment shall be granted to the respondents. The matter was, as such, heard...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »