Advanced Search Results

Ex Nk Jay Prakash Gupta Ser No 7773020 K vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shivam Sachdeva SPC, Mr. Yash Agrawal, Mr. Sparsh Ruhela, Mr. Praveen Kumar

$~6 and 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 10.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 18861/2025 & CM APPL. 78488/2025 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivam Sachdeva SPC,...

Union of India & Ors. vs Ex Nk Jay Prakash Gupta 7773030K

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shivam Sachdeva SPC, Mr. Yash Agrawal, Mr. Sparsh Ruhela, Mr. Praveen Kumar

$~6 and 7* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 10.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 18861/2025 & CM APPL. 78488/2025 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivam Sachdeva SPC, Mr....

Ramesh Chandra Dixit Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal and an ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sectopm 10

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ354All

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Adhar Pande and ;Rakesh Pande, Advs.

M. Katju, J.1. The petitioner was a permanent weaver in the service of the respondent No. 2. He also worked as substitute Line Mistry as and when the occasion arose between 1974 to 1984. In 1982...

Sarvesh Chandra Shukla Vs. U.P. Higher Secondary Education Services Co ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pardesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16G(3); Uttar Pardesh Intermediate Education Regulation, 1921 - Regulations 31 to 45; Uttar Pardesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Act, 1982 - Sections 21

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC616

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Pande, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. A punishment was inflicted upon the petitioner pursuant to the resolution dated 12th of October, 1991, which was approved by the Commission by its order dated 8th of June, 1995, communicated by communication...

In Re: Secretary, Hight Court Bar Association

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 233 to 236; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 4

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2608

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Pande, Adv.

Rakesh Tewari, S.S. Kulshrestha, Prakash Krishna, D.P. Singh and A.P. Sahi, JJ.1. This Bench has been constituted in an unprecedented situation in the history of this High Court where the Executive organ of the State, namely,...

Ajab Singh Vs. U.P. State Public Service Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : [1996(73)FLR945]; (1996)IILLJ438All

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Pande, Adv.

P.K. Mukherjee, J. 1. Earlier, when this writ petition was moved before me, on September 4, 1995 learned Standing Counsel was granted time to obtain instructions. Learned Standing Counsel was further directed to show-cause as to...

Krishna Murari Agarwal Vs. Prescribed Authority/A.C.J.M., Mainpuri and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1) and 34(1)

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC2366

Advocate for Appellant : Janmed Kumar and ;Rakesh Pande, Advs.

J.C. Gupta, J.1. Heard petitioner's counsel.2. This is tenant's writ petition directed against the order dated 18.4.98 passed by the Prescribed Authority rejecting the petitioner's prayer for summoning witnesses for cross-examination. Against this order the petitioner...

Sunil Kumar Singh Vs. Superintendant of Police and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Police Regulations - Regulation 228, 228(1), 240 and 240(1) - Rule 240; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Panel Code - Sections 307, 329, 379, 411, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 474

Reported in : 1997(1)ALT(Cri)18; 1997CriLJ3201

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Pande, Adv.

D.C. Srivastava, J.1. The petitioner in the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has prayed for a writ of ccrtiorari quashing the report of respondent No. 2 given on 14-8-1994 as contained in...

Devendra Pratap Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Pande; N.I. Jafri; Vikas Sahai, Advs

1. Heard Sri N.I. Jafri,learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. for the respondent no. 1 and perused the record. None is present for the respondent no. 2. 2. This is an application under...

R. Mayilvahanam S/O Ramaiah Pillai and Vs. Intelligence Officer, Narco ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 21, 23, 27A, 29, 35, 41, 41(1), 41(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 43, 50, 52 to 55, 57 and 68; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendmemt) Act, 2001; Evidence Act - Sections 125; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100 and 165; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(3) and 21

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4425; ILR2008KAR4166; ILR2008(4)Kar4166; 2008(4)KCCRSN251; 2008(5)AIRKarR408; 2008CriLJ4425;

Advocate for Appellant : Hashmath Pasha, Adv. in Criminal Appeal No. 2236/2006 and; Urval N. Ramanand, Sr. Counsel in Criminal Appeal No. 627/2007

V. Jagannathan, J.1. 'In every case the end result is important, but the means to achieve it must remain above board' observed the Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh : 1999CriLJ3672 when the...