Advanced Search Results

Boota Singh Vs. The State Of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : RAJNISH KUMAR JHA __

1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.421 OF2021BOOTA SINGH & OTHERS …Appellants Versus STATE OF HARYANA …Respondent JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. This appeal challenges the judgment and final...

Ravi Dhingra Vs. The State Of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : KAMLENDRA MISHRA __ MONIKA GUSAIN

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.987 OF2009RAVI DHINGRA ….. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA ….. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.989­990 OF2009CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.986 OF2009CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.988 OF2009AND CRIMINAL...

Surender Singh Dalal Vs. M/S Mother Dairy

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:12th August, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2855/2014 SURENDER SINGH DALAL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Rakesh Mudgal and Mr. Dinesh Mudgal, Advs. versus...

Rahdey Lal Vs. the Chief Administration, Haryana Urban Development Aut ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 16

Reported in : 2008(101)DRJ121

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Mudgal, Adv

Mukundakam Sharma, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 14th of September, 2007 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition of the appellant on the ground that the Delhi Court does...

Smt. Har Naraini Devi and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 48, 50 and 52; Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act, 1964; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 19, 21, 31A, 31B, 31C and 368

Reported in : 162(2009)DLT663

Advocate for Appellant : Santosh Singh and; Rakesh Mudgal, Advs

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. Through this writ petition, the petitioners seek that Clause (a) of Section 50 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act'), be declared unconstitutional, allegedly being...

Radhey Lal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Mudgal, Mr. Santosh Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7054/2003 % April 11, 2013 RADHEY LAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Mudgal and Mr. Santosh Singh Advocates. versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS....